ODP .Net Connection Pool Problem on Web Application

  • Thread starter Thread starter mingki
  • Start date Start date
M

mingki

Hi Developers,

I am a .Net developer of a Large Online Retailling Company. I would
like to have your help on a Connection Pool issue.

Recently we have developed a Web Application on ODP .Net to work with
Oracle Database 10g. To gain the performance, connection pool enable is
a must. Everything work fine throughout the development period and the
performance is Great, however while the Web Application is deployed to
the production, sooner or later (a few minutes or a few days) all the
Connections in the connection pool will be unavailable and the ODP .NET
keeps throwing:

"The Exception: Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleException Connection
request timed out at ...
Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleConnection.Open()
...."

It seems to me that all the Connections in the Connection Pool are
busy, as a result once the "Connection timeout" period is over, the
OracleConnection.Open() throws this Exception.

However, when I look into the sessions information at the Database, all
the Sessions (Max Pool Size=40, for instance) are in Wait Events -
SQL*Net message from client for a long long time.

I can just find a reason for this: In the Web Application, every
concurrent incoming requests is handled by a separating thread
concurrently. For some pages, it may hit a long query in the database.
For some reason, those pages will be Timeout and IIS 6.0 will call
"Thread.Abort()" to stop the corresponding thread. I can catch
Exception "System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being
aborted. at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpsSql.ExecuteReader( ... " at the
DataAccess Layer.

To reproduce the problem in a simplier program, I have created a
long-running query aginst the all_objects table in DB and started 20
threads for it. At the middle of each Thread Executing, I issue the
Thread.Abort(). After all threads are aborted and all OracleDataReader,
OracleCommand, OracleParameters and OracleConnection are disposed in
the finally block, I tried to run the query but it will fail to obtain
a connection from the connection pool.

If I set "pooling = false", there will be no problem.

The testing program can be downloaded at:
http://ki-gallery.dyndns.org/download/ThreadAbortTest.zip

in which there are a .Net solution, a plsql script
"pkg_test_thread_abort.plsql" for the stored procedure being called
against the "all_objects" table and a screenshot
"Database_Sessions_Status.jpg" about the idle sessions in the database.
Please try to use Anti-Virus program to scan the zip package :)

I thank you for your help !

Regards,
Alex
 
Hi Developers,

I am a .Net developer of a Large Online Retailling Company. I would
like to have your help on a Connection Pool issue.

Recently we have developed a Web Application on ODP .Net to work with
Oracle Database 10g. To gain the performance, connection pool enable
is a must. Everything work fine throughout the development period and
the performance is Great, however while the Web Application is
deployed to the production, sooner or later (a few minutes or a few
days) all the Connections in the connection pool will be unavailable
and the ODP .NET keeps throwing:

"The Exception: Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleException Connection
request timed out at ...
Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleConnection.Open()
..."

It seems to me that all the Connections in the Connection Pool are
busy, as a result once the "Connection timeout" period is over, the
OracleConnection.Open() throws this Exception.

However, when I look into the sessions information at the Database,
all the Sessions (Max Pool Size=40, for instance) are in Wait Events -
SQL*Net message from client for a long long time.

I can just find a reason for this: In the Web Application, every
concurrent incoming requests is handled by a separating thread
concurrently. For some pages, it may hit a long query in the database.
For some reason, those pages will be Timeout and IIS 6.0 will call
"Thread.Abort()" to stop the corresponding thread. I can catch
Exception "System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being
aborted. at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OpsSql.ExecuteReader( ... " at
the DataAccess Layer.

To reproduce the problem in a simplier program, I have created a
long-running query aginst the all_objects table in DB and started 20
threads for it. At the middle of each Thread Executing, I issue the
Thread.Abort(). After all threads are aborted and all
OracleDataReader, OracleCommand, OracleParameters and
OracleConnection are disposed in the finally block, I tried to run
the query but it will fail to obtain a connection from the connection
pool.

If I set "pooling = false", there will be no problem.

The testing program can be downloaded at:
http://ki-gallery.dyndns.org/download/ThreadAbortTest.zip

in which there are a .Net solution, a plsql script
"pkg_test_thread_abort.plsql" for the stored procedure being called
against the "all_objects" table and a screenshot
"Database_Sessions_Status.jpg" about the idle sessions in the
database. Please try to use Anti-Virus program to scan the zip
package :)

I thank you for your help !

Regards,
Alex
Click to expand...

You set maxpool to 10 but you start 20 threads, which I think will
cause problems as all 20 will want a connection.

Also, the connection string is very long. Be aware that to re-use a
connection from the pool, the connection string has to match exactly
with the connectionstring of a live connection in the pool. So I'd
suggest to store the data you have in the connection string now in a
tns file, or define the name with a network setup ( I do that too,
works without problems, I never have to use such a long connection
string).

FB

--
 
You're describing a (very) typical problem when working with a .NET (ASP)
application. I would read the article I wrote on handling the Connection
pool. It addresses these issues.
See http://www.betav.com/sql_server_magazine.htm

--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com/blog/billva
www.betav.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________
 
thanks, FB!

yes, I have started 20 thread to get the connections from pool.
However, all of them will be aborted and the 10 connections in pool are
supposed to be released back to the pool .

Unluckly it seems to me that all the connections in the pool are no
longer available unless the application is restarted.
 
Hi FB,

In addtion, I am sure, and you may have a try, that if I set
"pooling=false", the above program is working fine.

Regards,
Alex
 
I expect that 10 of those connections are not being closed...

--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com/blog/billva
www.betav.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________
 
In the source code, the OracleConnection instance should be disposed by
the using() block:

using (OracleConnection dbConnection = new OracleConnection(blah))
{
}

the connection is supposed to be disposed, please let me know if I got
any mis-understanding about the use of using() {}.
 
I have seen a very similar issue come up when using SQL connection and
leaving them open. It is possible that only one connection in your
code fails to close the connection, but if that piece of code is
executed several times over, you will receive this error.

I have run into this problem when using data readers for fetching SQL
records. Any time you open a connection or use a data reader, it must
be followed by a Close call. Interestingly enough, I was occasionally
still receiving errors of the sort. I determined the error to be
caused by exceptions thrown while in the midst of a connection; I now
wrap any data reader connection as follows:

SqlDataReader dr = null;
try {

// SQLHelper - Microsoft Data access App.
dr = SQLHelper.ExecuteReader (....);
while (dr.Read ()) {

_myStrings.Add (dr.GetString(0));
_myInt.Add (dr.GetInt32(1));
}
dr.Close();
}
catch {

dr.Close ();
throw;
}

In some cases, I will simply put a finally block that has the
dr.Close() in it, but only if I don't care to re-throw the exception.
Anyway, I recommend you ensure anywhere you open a connection, you
close it. .NET does not close them when the object goes out of scope.
 
I have find some reason for the problem.

The problem is caused by, when the IIS server's "executionTimeout" for
httpRequest is reached, IIS will call Thread.Abort() to stop the
processing thread for the Request.

For instance, If a web page is requested, meanwhile the database is
very busy, the Database can't return all the result to the web
application within 40 sec (the default value of executionTimeout in
machine.config), this thread will be aborted!

I have just read the Release note of ODP .NET 10.2.0.1.0, in the
section "TIPS, LIMITATIONS AND KNOWN ISSUES", it says:

8. Thread.Abort() should not be used, as unmanaged resources may remain
unreleased properly, which can potentially cause memory leaks and
hangs.


It seems that we can just avoid the problem by setting the
executionTimeout value to a reasonablily large value. However, this
will greatly affect the web server performance as some Threads will be
hold and they are not able to serve other requests.

Please advise!

Regards,
Alex
 
ExecutionTimeout can be set in your applications Web.Config
configuration file. Doing this only affects the one application
instead of all IIS applications. Furthermore, I would investigate the
programmatic overriding of the setting. Using the .NET configuration
namespace I would think (but have not tried!) that you should be able
to override this setting on a per-page basis. This way, only pages
that execute intensive database calls have this extended execution
timeout.

I have received word that extending the executionTimeout setting is
common for sites that accept large uploads. There exist some
Microsoft recommendations on this that you should Google.
 
Back
Top