D. Eth said:http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_178.13_whql.html
New 32-bit drivers.
My gaming performance index went from a 4.9 to a 5.5
Vista just getting better and better.
Yeah, baby !
Jon said:Good news of course, but I wish they'd add the GeForce 5-series to that
list of products supported. Unlikely to happen, but how much more effort
would it really involve to add a little more backward compatibility?
D. Eth said:http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_178.13_whql.html
New 32-bit drivers.
My gaming performance index went from a 4.9 to a 5.5
Vista [is] just getting better and better.
Yeah, baby !
Alias said:D. Eth said:http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_178.13_whql.html
New 32-bit drivers.
My gaming performance index went from a 4.9 to a 5.5
Vista [is] just getting better and better.
Yeah, baby !
Yep, Vista is a toy operating system design for gaming. In that regard, it
beats Ubuntu hands down. In fact, I plan to install Vista so I can take
advantage of the DX10 for gaming. But for real work with no viruses or
malware, rebooting, updating to death, BSODs etc., Ubuntu's the wise
choice.
Alias
D. Eth said:Alias said:D. Eth said:http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_178.13_whql.html
New 32-bit drivers.
My gaming performance index went from a 4.9 to a 5.5
Vista [is] just getting better and better.
Yeah, baby !
Yep, Vista is a toy operating system design for gaming. In that
regard, it beats Ubuntu hands down. In fact, I plan to install Vista
so I can take advantage of the DX10 for gaming. But for real work with
no viruses or malware, rebooting, updating to death, BSODs etc.,
Ubuntu's the wise choice.
Alias
ubuntu updates every other day !
sometimes one days updates are retractions of previous updates !
LOL... !
It's friggen hilarious.
Alias said:D. Eth said:Alias said:D. Eth wrote:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_178.13_whql.html
New 32-bit drivers.
My gaming performance index went from a 4.9 to a 5.5
Vista [is] just getting better and better.
Yeah, baby !
Yep, Vista is a toy operating system design for gaming. In that regard,
it beats Ubuntu hands down. In fact, I plan to install Vista so I can
take advantage of the DX10 for gaming. But for real work with no viruses
or malware, rebooting, updating to death, BSODs etc., Ubuntu's the wise
choice.
Alias
ubuntu updates every other day !
A lie.
sometimes one days updates are retractions of previous updates !
So? What have you got against making something better?
LOL... !
It's friggen hilarious.
What's pathetic is to have to go round the Net looking for updates. Ubuntu
has them all in one place and requires no looking around. Of course, you
didn't address the fact that Windows is a top operating system made for
playing games.
Alias
Nogginsaked said:How long has Vista been out and the video driver performance is just
catching up to XP drivers?
Yeah, baby . . .
Strange that the Ubuntu forum entries don't reflect that premise.Alias said:D. Eth said:http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x86_178.13_whql.html
New 32-bit drivers.
My gaming performance index went from a 4.9 to a 5.5
Vista [is] just getting better and better.
Yeah, baby !
Yep, Vista is a toy operating system design for gaming. In that regard, it
beats Ubuntu hands down. In fact, I plan to install Vista so I can take
advantage of the DX10 for gaming. But for real work with no viruses or
malware, rebooting, updating to death, BSODs etc., Ubuntu's the wise
choice.
Alias
How long has Vista been out and the video driver performance is just
catching up to XP drivers?
Yeah, baby . . .
+Bob+ wrote:
Exactly. Here's how to increase that Vista performance two-fold:
1. Format C:
2. Install XP
-------------------------------------------
Wrong!
1) Format C: Install Vista.
2) Know what-the-fukk you're doing.
But in your case, #2 is impossible so sticking with XP is best.
+Bob+ said:Q. Why does MS have hardware requirements set significantly higher for
Vista and why does everyone in the know recommend hardware twice as
powerful to comfortably run it?
A. Because Vista's performance is much worse than XP