G
Guest
This is just a comment.
MSDN states that the version must be:
<quote>
A String value that specifies the version of the .NET Framework that this
application supports. The string value must match the directory name found
under the .NET Framework installation root. The contents of the string value
are not parsed.
</quote>
I personally it's not scalable. I know the Microsoft guys had their
reasoning behind this, but would it be better to let me specify
version="2.0"? The change from requiredRuntime to supportedRuntime made me
think they are swaying between some ideas...
MSDN states that the version must be:
<quote>
A String value that specifies the version of the .NET Framework that this
application supports. The string value must match the directory name found
under the .NET Framework installation root. The contents of the string value
are not parsed.
</quote>
I personally it's not scalable. I know the Microsoft guys had their
reasoning behind this, but would it be better to let me specify
version="2.0"? The change from requiredRuntime to supportedRuntime made me
think they are swaying between some ideas...