Not getting "argument type mismatch"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave Unger
  • Start date Start date
D

Dave Unger

Hello,

When I compile the following code, I get a "Byref argument type mismatch", which is exactly what I'd expect to get.

Sub test1()
Dim l As Long
l = 3
test2 l
End Sub

Sub test2(s As String)
'do someting
End Sub

So my question is, why don't I get a compile error on this bit of code? I thought my Excel had become corrupted, but I tried it on other machines, same results - no compile error.

Sub test1()
Dim r As Range
Set r = Range("a1")
test2 r
End Sub

Sub test2(w As Worksheet)
'do someting
End Sub

Thank you,

Regards

DaveU
 
Dave said:
Hello,

When I compile the following code, I get a "Byref argument type mismatch", which is exactly what I'd expect to get.

Sub test1()
Dim l As Long
l = 3
test2 l
End Sub

Sub test2(s As String)
'do someting
End Sub

So my question is, why don't I get a compile error on this bit of code? I thought my Excel had become corrupted, but I tried it on other machines, same results - no compile error.

Sub test1()
Dim r As Range
Set r = Range("a1")
test2 r
End Sub

Sub test2(w As Worksheet)
'do someting
End Sub

Thank you,

Regards

DaveU


try that
Sub test1()
Dim r As Range
Set r = Range("a1")
Set r = Nothing
test2 r
End Sub

Sub test2(w As Worksheet)
'do someting
End Sub


Do you see why it is not compile error?

It is because range and worksheet can be "compatible" if value is nothing.
Variable value can be determined only at runtime.
 
Hi Witek,

Thanks for your reply.
Sub test1()
Dim r As Range
Set r = Range("a1")
Set r = Nothing
test2 r
End Sub
Sub test2(w As Worksheet)
'do someting
End Sub
Do you see why it is not compile error?

I think so, need to "ponder" this a while.
It is because range and worksheet can be "compatible" if value is nothing..
Variable value can be determined only at runtime.

This all came to my attention because I'd changed the argument in test2 from a range to worksheet (actual project very large), and was counting on thecompiler to flag all the calling procedures I'd need to modify. You've given me food for thought, I don't think I've ever encountered (or noticed??)this before.

Thank you,

DaveU
 
Dave said:
Hi Witek,

Thanks for your reply.




I think so, need to "ponder" this a while.


This all came to my attention because I'd changed the argument in test2 from a range to worksheet (actual project very large), and was counting on the compiler to flag all the calling procedures I'd need to modify. You've given me food for thought, I don't think I've ever encountered (or noticed??) this before.

Thank you,

DaveU

That will be happening with all procedures where arguments are objects.
I usually add dummy argument to procedure. Compiler will catch that.
 
Hi witek,
That will be happening with all procedures where arguments are objects.
I've been doing this for a few years now, and while not pretending to be an expert by any stretch of the imagination, I did think I had this arguments area pretty much "cased" - just goes to show that one never stops learning, and there's always more!
I usually add dummy argument to procedure. Compiler will catch that.
Good tip! Thanks.

Regards

DaveU
 
Back
Top