Everything you guys said makes sense. Currently the IPs are set
statically, even though DHCP reservations would work the same way.
It makes sense that non-domain servers don't support 'secure' updates,
as the 'secure' is a function of the domain.
Exactly. (Technically, any "trusted domain's" machines should
work also, but I cannot remember having tested that since generally
I have them register with a DNS-DC from their own domain.0
Secure means literally that the computer account must be authenticated
on the domain (or a trusted domain).
--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]
Thanks
Blake
If I enable SECURE UPDATES only on a Windows 2003 mixed mode AD, can
a non-domain member dynamically update it's DNS records?
No. (But it has nothing to do with "mixed mode".)
Only machines which can authenticate will be able update their
own records.
I am getting the error on a couple of servers (some domain members,
some not)
Expect the errors on non-domain machines. You either must
use DHCP (a domain server) to do the registration for them,
or you must do this manually.
The system could not register the DNS update request because of a
security related problem.
Generally it is NOT a big issue for servers (most should be in
the domain anyway) since you if you cannot use DHCP for the
server then you already have to manage it manually and adding
it's permanent address is a one-time chore.
Also recognize you can even give out DHCP assigned addresses
to MOST 'servers' requiring permanent addresses (to remain the
same) by using RESERVATIONS.
Once the DHCP server is 'in control' of the address and set to
do the registration only the account of the DHCP server matters.
(And with Win2003, you can even specify an account for the
DHCP servers to use -- although that feature is not in Win2000
it can still do the registrations securely.)
--
Herb Martin, MCSE, MVP
Accelerated MCSE
http://www.LearnQuick.Com
[phone number on web site]
Blake