C
Chris Birkett
I've been scanning a lot of my black and white negatives with my Minolta
Scan Dual III and VueScan. However, I've been noticing that a lot of the
time, the black (clear) areas have absolutely dreadful amounts of grain.
It's like golf balls sometimes, it's so gigantic. When it transitions to
black, it will go white, grey, golf balls black. I know a lot of my
negatives aren't exactly exposed particularly well (I do a lot of push
processing), but I've seen lots of scans of pushed negatives that look
great. It even happens in normally exposed negatives wherever there's a
dark area.
My normal method of scanning is to set VueScan to B&W and use the TMax 100
settings, with neutral colour. I then use the black and white point
settings to manipulate the histogram and capture a full range of tones.
This means I end up with flat scans which are (supposedly) better for later
adjustment. I've tried scanning my negatives as slides, but all I end up
with that way is more contrast. I am scanning in 16 bit.
Here's a couple of examples (HP5 Plus, EI 400 in D-76 1:1):
http://www.noctilust.com/images/example1.jpg
The transition from grey to black is very abrupt, like it's being clipped or
something, it just goes straight to nasty grain. There's a magnified view
of a different photo below.
http://www.noctilust.com/images/example2.jpg
General grain all over the place.
http://www.noctilust.com/images/example3.jpg
Here's a somewhat magnified view. I can see there is grain everwhere in the
scan, but the transition to black is disgusting, and very distracting in all
my scanned shots. I've heard similar-looking stuff described as "pepper
grain" before.
I don't have a lot of experience with black and white film (well, I have
shot about 30 rolls, but I've never printed it), so I'm really not sure
whether to expect large amounts of grain in thin areas of the negative. Is
this the scanner, the way I'm scanning, or a fact of life? I haven't
adjusted these scans yet, this is how they look when I scan them. Could
anyone recommend a better method?
As a side note, I've also noticed that a lot of my scans are not aligned
correctly. They can be off by as much as 0.2 degrees both ways, which is
very annoying, because I have to rotate them (which isn't ideal for some
scenes), or crop off even more than the negative carrier does.
- Chris
Scan Dual III and VueScan. However, I've been noticing that a lot of the
time, the black (clear) areas have absolutely dreadful amounts of grain.
It's like golf balls sometimes, it's so gigantic. When it transitions to
black, it will go white, grey, golf balls black. I know a lot of my
negatives aren't exactly exposed particularly well (I do a lot of push
processing), but I've seen lots of scans of pushed negatives that look
great. It even happens in normally exposed negatives wherever there's a
dark area.
My normal method of scanning is to set VueScan to B&W and use the TMax 100
settings, with neutral colour. I then use the black and white point
settings to manipulate the histogram and capture a full range of tones.
This means I end up with flat scans which are (supposedly) better for later
adjustment. I've tried scanning my negatives as slides, but all I end up
with that way is more contrast. I am scanning in 16 bit.
Here's a couple of examples (HP5 Plus, EI 400 in D-76 1:1):
http://www.noctilust.com/images/example1.jpg
The transition from grey to black is very abrupt, like it's being clipped or
something, it just goes straight to nasty grain. There's a magnified view
of a different photo below.
http://www.noctilust.com/images/example2.jpg
General grain all over the place.
http://www.noctilust.com/images/example3.jpg
Here's a somewhat magnified view. I can see there is grain everwhere in the
scan, but the transition to black is disgusting, and very distracting in all
my scanned shots. I've heard similar-looking stuff described as "pepper
grain" before.
I don't have a lot of experience with black and white film (well, I have
shot about 30 rolls, but I've never printed it), so I'm really not sure
whether to expect large amounts of grain in thin areas of the negative. Is
this the scanner, the way I'm scanning, or a fact of life? I haven't
adjusted these scans yet, this is how they look when I scan them. Could
anyone recommend a better method?
As a side note, I've also noticed that a lot of my scans are not aligned
correctly. They can be off by as much as 0.2 degrees both ways, which is
very annoying, because I have to rotate them (which isn't ideal for some
scenes), or crop off even more than the negative carrier does.
- Chris