supercalifragilistic expialidocious said:
hey idiot.. you probably have a new computer with vista installed on it..
have you ANY FRIKIN idea how fast it would be with XP?????
and do you have any frikin idea how slow your OLD computer would be with
Vista on it?
Vista is just a pig with lipstick... the OS is bearable only if you have a
very fast computer..
I have a 4 core with 6 gigs of ram and tripple boot... vista seems slower
in everything than XP and linux on this same computer..
heck it seems slower than my 5 year old laptop with XP on it! lol
Don't lie.
You don't like Vista ... so you make up stuff.
I also triple boot Vista,XP, and a linux distro.
Vista boot time 21 sec....linux 28 sec.
Vista opening MS Word 3 sec....linux OO Writer 9 sec.
Vista first opening of IE7 2 sec ... linux Iceweasel ... 7 sec.
This goes on and on ... so obviously Vista is superior speed wise and with
assigning resources.
And if you think its because I have a brand new PC...it isn't.
My PC has an Nforce 4 SLI x16, a PD 3.2 GHz CPU, 2 GB 667Mhz RAM, 2x Geforce
6800's.
It's over 2 years old.
The only thing I've seen noticeably slower on Vista is the first opening of
WinMail.
SP1 fixed slow file copying.
One thing I noticed recently is preconfigured PC's.
Best Buy has a Gateway with 8 GB RAM...yet it only has a Geforce 6150
graphics card.
It ran like crap.
So somebody buying that is gonna be disappointed...and the store will claim
its Vista....when it really is a poorly designed PC.
Put a dam real graphics card in it !