G
Guest
Hi: I just bought a used laptop from a local refurb shop.
I am beating myself up for not asking before making the decision to buy, but
I didn't, so now am trying to make the best of the situation: I didn't get
any disk for reinstalling the OS (Win XP Pro). There's a Microsoft
Certificate of Authenticity sticker on the bottom of the machine with my
product key on it, and I've confirmed that it's legit, here on the "How to
tell..." page, but I would like to be able to burn a reinstallation disk from
what's here, if the installation left what I need on the drive for that
purpose. I searched around and learned that if reinstallation files were
loaded on the pc, in lieu of providing me with a CD, I'd find them in a very,
very large directory c:\i386 OR c:\windows\i386. I don't have that folder or
those files.
I called the shop to ask if maybe they'd hidden such a set of files
somewhere I'd missed, and the guy said no -- that if I were ever to need to
reinstall, I'd need to borrow someone else's WinXP Pro disk to install with,
and then register/validate with this product key.
The guy says this is standard practice for refurbished machines, and even
for many new ones - that although the vendor is able to install the OS and
provide me with a legal license/product key: 1) there's no installation disk
that comes with the machine, and 2) there are not the files copied to the
hard-drive that the articles I've read suggest should be there.
From what those articles say, when those files do exist, they are basically
a copy of the files from an installation cd, correct? And now I'm hearing
that the licenses that Microsoft sells to retailers don't permit copying of
the install-files to the hard-drive. Maybe they used to and don't any more,
or maybe they only do in certain circumstances (depending on what the
retailer bought), but generally no -- that would be a violation of copyright,
for the shop to have copied the files to the hard-drive.
SO when (not if) I need access to installation files, my only **legal**
options are 1) buy a copy of the OS (even though I paid for a license for the
OS that's running on my machine right now) or 2) borrow a disk and use that
(NOT copy it) to install, but then supply the product key of my own license
during re-registration/re-validation. Is that right?
AND is this standard with refurbished machines?
Could that be right -- maybe because the only way the vendor could have
supplied me with a disk would be for him to have bought and sold me a more
expensive version, the retail version of the software? Is it
right/legal/consistent with whatever license he would have bought that he
would install without providing me the means to re-install?
When I confirmed that my software is legit, the last page asked if the COA
had "OEM Product" under the name of the product. It doesn't. The validation
page said in that case, I should have received a "recovery solutions" CD from
my PC manufacturer. BUT of course, I didn't buy this from the manufacturer.
I bought it from a refurbisher. SO maybe that page is wrong?
Thanks for help shedding light on this absurd situation!
I am beating myself up for not asking before making the decision to buy, but
I didn't, so now am trying to make the best of the situation: I didn't get
any disk for reinstalling the OS (Win XP Pro). There's a Microsoft
Certificate of Authenticity sticker on the bottom of the machine with my
product key on it, and I've confirmed that it's legit, here on the "How to
tell..." page, but I would like to be able to burn a reinstallation disk from
what's here, if the installation left what I need on the drive for that
purpose. I searched around and learned that if reinstallation files were
loaded on the pc, in lieu of providing me with a CD, I'd find them in a very,
very large directory c:\i386 OR c:\windows\i386. I don't have that folder or
those files.
I called the shop to ask if maybe they'd hidden such a set of files
somewhere I'd missed, and the guy said no -- that if I were ever to need to
reinstall, I'd need to borrow someone else's WinXP Pro disk to install with,
and then register/validate with this product key.
The guy says this is standard practice for refurbished machines, and even
for many new ones - that although the vendor is able to install the OS and
provide me with a legal license/product key: 1) there's no installation disk
that comes with the machine, and 2) there are not the files copied to the
hard-drive that the articles I've read suggest should be there.
From what those articles say, when those files do exist, they are basically
a copy of the files from an installation cd, correct? And now I'm hearing
that the licenses that Microsoft sells to retailers don't permit copying of
the install-files to the hard-drive. Maybe they used to and don't any more,
or maybe they only do in certain circumstances (depending on what the
retailer bought), but generally no -- that would be a violation of copyright,
for the shop to have copied the files to the hard-drive.
SO when (not if) I need access to installation files, my only **legal**
options are 1) buy a copy of the OS (even though I paid for a license for the
OS that's running on my machine right now) or 2) borrow a disk and use that
(NOT copy it) to install, but then supply the product key of my own license
during re-registration/re-validation. Is that right?
AND is this standard with refurbished machines?
Could that be right -- maybe because the only way the vendor could have
supplied me with a disk would be for him to have bought and sold me a more
expensive version, the retail version of the software? Is it
right/legal/consistent with whatever license he would have bought that he
would install without providing me the means to re-install?
When I confirmed that my software is legit, the last page asked if the COA
had "OEM Product" under the name of the product. It doesn't. The validation
page said in that case, I should have received a "recovery solutions" CD from
my PC manufacturer. BUT of course, I didn't buy this from the manufacturer.
I bought it from a refurbisher. SO maybe that page is wrong?
Thanks for help shedding light on this absurd situation!