N
Nicolas Verhaeghe
I use a LaCie NAS based on XP Embedded as a file server.
This file server is now part of the SBS 2003 domain and things work fine, so
far, until some of my users have started to get this error message when
trying to access the server:
"No more connections can be made to this remote computer at this time
because there are already as many connections as the computer can accept".
This is somewhat strange, because I have more CALs than users on my SBS 2003
(20 cals, limits of 23, according to the Licensing tool, for 18 current
users).
But this should really not matter...
XP Embedded is really limited, as you know, as far as administrative tools,
so I cannot know how many users are currently connected. My tech support
with LaCie has expired and I thought that this could be related to our new
setup and post the question here.
Maybe there is something that I ignore about XP Embedded?
My current workaround is to log my users as administrator when connecting to
the NAS, but this is not something I will do in the long run, of course...
Thanks in advance for your help!
This file server is now part of the SBS 2003 domain and things work fine, so
far, until some of my users have started to get this error message when
trying to access the server:
"No more connections can be made to this remote computer at this time
because there are already as many connections as the computer can accept".
This is somewhat strange, because I have more CALs than users on my SBS 2003
(20 cals, limits of 23, according to the Licensing tool, for 18 current
users).
But this should really not matter...
XP Embedded is really limited, as you know, as far as administrative tools,
so I cannot know how many users are currently connected. My tech support
with LaCie has expired and I thought that this could be related to our new
setup and post the question here.
Maybe there is something that I ignore about XP Embedded?
My current workaround is to log my users as administrator when connecting to
the NAS, but this is not something I will do in the long run, of course...
Thanks in advance for your help!