A
Andy
Hello,
I have the following setup:
Site West - domain1.com:
Domain1 Domain Controller 1 <root (1st DC brought up), GC>
Domain1 Domain Controller 2 <infrastructure master>
Site East - domain2.com:
Domain2 Domain Controller 1 <GC>
Domain2 Domain Controller 2 <infrastructure master>
(All other FSMO roles owned by GC server)
The problem I'm encountering is this:
The two sites are linked via a point-to-point VPN. If a
DC in site east goes down, everything is still able to
function normally. If a DC (either one) goes down in site
west, then the entire forest loses the ability to resolve
DNS, and users at both sites are unable to login to their
Win2k pro machines.
My DNS setup is as follows:
Domain1 DC1 and DC2 are AD integrated DNS servers for
Domain1. They also hold secondary DNS zones for Domain2.
The reverse is true of Domain2 DC1 and DC2.
My understanding of how the system works is that each DC
should be able to operate independently, being able to
failover for each other in the event one goes down. Can
anyone help explain the reasons for the problem that I'm
experiencing? Thanks in advance!
--Andy
I have the following setup:
Site West - domain1.com:
Domain1 Domain Controller 1 <root (1st DC brought up), GC>
Domain1 Domain Controller 2 <infrastructure master>
Site East - domain2.com:
Domain2 Domain Controller 1 <GC>
Domain2 Domain Controller 2 <infrastructure master>
(All other FSMO roles owned by GC server)
The problem I'm encountering is this:
The two sites are linked via a point-to-point VPN. If a
DC in site east goes down, everything is still able to
function normally. If a DC (either one) goes down in site
west, then the entire forest loses the ability to resolve
DNS, and users at both sites are unable to login to their
Win2k pro machines.
My DNS setup is as follows:
Domain1 DC1 and DC2 are AD integrated DNS servers for
Domain1. They also hold secondary DNS zones for Domain2.
The reverse is true of Domain2 DC1 and DC2.
My understanding of how the system works is that each DC
should be able to operate independently, being able to
failover for each other in the event one goes down. Can
anyone help explain the reasons for the problem that I'm
experiencing? Thanks in advance!
--Andy