G
Guest
I bought a full boxed version of Vista Home Premium today and got it home to
discover that it doesn't ship with the 64 bit version in the box. I'm livid
about this - the version comparison page on Vista says that Home Premium
allows for 64 bit installs and I've only discovered in retrospect that buried
away at the bottom of the page a couple of clicks away is the information
that you have to send off for the DVD separately. I paid nearly $350 CAD for
this software, how much extra would it have cost Microsoft to include another
DVD in the box? Instead I have to fill out a bunch of information on their
website, pay another $15 and wait up to 10 days for delivery of the install
disk that should have been included in the box.
It's bad enough that they've set back the PC industry 5 years by even
releasing a 32 bit version of Vista. At least if 64 bit DVDs shipped as
standard there'd be a chance there might be a reasonable number of 64 bit
installs, with this retarded bit of cost cutting most people are just going
to opt for 32 bit versions. I wonder how long before people start realising
that with the new driver model they won't be able to run a lot of games if
they have a DX10 video card with more than 512MB of RAM because half their
address space is used up by mapped video memory? I thought Vista was supposed
to be good for games...
discover that it doesn't ship with the 64 bit version in the box. I'm livid
about this - the version comparison page on Vista says that Home Premium
allows for 64 bit installs and I've only discovered in retrospect that buried
away at the bottom of the page a couple of clicks away is the information
that you have to send off for the DVD separately. I paid nearly $350 CAD for
this software, how much extra would it have cost Microsoft to include another
DVD in the box? Instead I have to fill out a bunch of information on their
website, pay another $15 and wait up to 10 days for delivery of the install
disk that should have been included in the box.
It's bad enough that they've set back the PC industry 5 years by even
releasing a 32 bit version of Vista. At least if 64 bit DVDs shipped as
standard there'd be a chance there might be a reasonable number of 64 bit
installs, with this retarded bit of cost cutting most people are just going
to opt for 32 bit versions. I wonder how long before people start realising
that with the new driver model they won't be able to run a lot of games if
they have a DX10 video card with more than 512MB of RAM because half their
address space is used up by mapped video memory? I thought Vista was supposed
to be good for games...