hm...what did you see wrong? I run it about a week and still runs just
fine, so i wonder where's the catch...
It's not so much what's wrong, it's what's the cost benefit analysis of
moving from XP to Vista says:
I've already spent $300 on hardware upgrades - but these will also
benefit me under XP (and they are now a sunk cost). The remaining cost is
the Vista license. For that expenditure I am looking to improve as many
MS applications and replace as many third party applications as possible.
Item 1: Movie Maker. User interface is not much improved from XP, but
then it was pretty good already. Better responsiveness and editing
precision. Marred by inability to create custom titles and credits (I
copied over my XP AddOnTFX folder to the MM shared directory, but it was
not used). Value to me: small positive.
Item 2: DVD Maker. This was to be my killer app for Vista. Finally I
could get rid of all the Nero, Sonic, etc junk and have one nice
streamlined place to do DVD authoring with excellent audio and video
quality (and I mean excellent) . But it doesn't allow enough user control
over menus to meet my needs. Very flash, but lacking in basics. I could
waste a DVD and copy off the MPG and AC3 files and re-burn them in
DVD-lab (which I am experimenting with), but does the quality improvement
merit the extra hassle (and the extra application to babysit). Value to
me: small positive (maybe more)
Item 3: Photo Gallery. Potential replacement for Picasa (which I really
like, but would still happily replace with an integrated equivalent).
Seems to have several design flaws (from reading the music_pictures_video
group) that put me off. Value to me: zero
Item 4: OneCare. I really like this. I can't stand NAV, which I have used
for years and has got steadily more intrusive and bloated. But wait! I
can have this on XP. Value to me: zero.
Items 5 & 6: IE7, WMP11 - both really nice, and equally available on XP.
So far we have a small positive advantage to Vista. So what about the OS
itself (you know, that invisible thing that lurks on your computer and
helps everything to work in harmony)?
Aero user interface. Takes more CPU and screen real estate than classic
windows (which I still use on XP). I don't care about the window
boundaries, I'm interested in what the application is doing inside the
window. And a stupid analog clock that winds up when I log in, is hidden
most of the time, adds no value when I can glance down at the bottom
right of the screen and see "20:24". Value to me: negative.
Security. Truly important, and I'll put up with any number of pop-ups so
long as I can say "Yes, I know about this, I'm happy with it, I authorize
you to never ask me again, and here's my credit card number [to prove
that I'm an adult]". But no, we get nanny-OS. No more drag and drop to
command window [this has not been disabled with a backdoor to re-enable
it, it has been removed]. No more unblocking of suspect programs. Ever
repeating warnings about the same thing. Value to me: negative.
If they'd done a better job on the applications (especially DVD Maker and
Photo Gallery), I'd still go with Vista. For now, rather than wait to buy
new laptops with Vista, I'll hurry and buy ones with XP - and a coupon
for Vista to hedge my bets. Hopefully Vista will improve before the
coupon expires...