Who better to give some tips to? It's the guy who's proud of doing it
the wrong way for 15 years that's not going to get clued. The newbie
can still *be* clued.
This is true. However, it was the *manner* of clueing that I was
objecting to mainly. It was rude, bordering on obnoxious; and wasn't
really a warm welcome to alt.comp.freeware. Further, there was no
positive input to help sort out the guy's question...I'm sure that there
are probably better/easier to use appz out there than the ones I
suggested, and the pooling of knowledge is surely what this group is for.
If you arrive in a new (to you) group, ask a question, and your only
replies are (say) pulling you up on your spelling and grammar then the
most likely response is to reply with equal rudeness, or not reply/return
at all.
The objections were:
As regards point 1. Who cares? It was question/answer/thanks, and the
thread was unlikely to go any further (unless somebody stepped in and
started flaming, that is). Fair enough, it's a bad habit to get into,
and can be a nightmare in long threads, but in this context it was
harmless.
Point 2 - top posting. I believe the top v. bottom posting argument is
still raging somewhere in this ng. I prefer posting at the bottom
myself, but I'm not going to get all anal about it if somebody doesn't
share my preferences. And I'm not yet so far gone -thank christ- that
I'm going to start waving FAQs about that are, after all, just somebody's
distilled opinions.
Nah, it's another example of the same thing that I've been whingeing
about since I arrived - people slapping others down INSTEAD of helping
them. There are so many different points of netiquette, and -more to the
point- so many different opinions about what that netiquette should be
that there's probably no such thing as a perfect post that can't be
objected to by somebody. And people who get their jollies/exercise their
PMS by picking on newbies who lack the confidence to answer back are
insensitive goits who should go out and get themselves a hobby IMO.