New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]
  • Start date Start date
-----Original Message-----
From: Nero [mailto:[email protected]]
Posted At: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:13 PM
Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
Conversation: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop

Other than motion desktop, ALL those are part of Vista ultimate
Click to expand...
5840(leaked)

Is the '(leaked)' an official part of build name?
 
He was talking about 5840 that was floating around the net before Vista went
RTM.
There were two versions(different build numbers)and one that was
not"leaked"had a few different icons.
Alexander Suhovey said:
-----Original Message-----
From: Nero [mailto:[email protected]]
Posted At: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:13 PM
Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
Conversation: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop

Other than motion desktop, ALL those are part of Vista ultimate
Click to expand...
5840(leaked)

Is the '(leaked)' an official part of build name?
Click to expand...
 
Oh Nero
Let's go over this once again,shall we.
#1-You state you're using 5840; and still have YET;to post in here using
Vista;let alone build 5840.
and
#2- You state that other than the motion desktop- that it's part of 5840.
Unless MSFT changed builds by magic-POOF-then at least 3 of Andre's
screenshots are DEFINETLY NOT build 5840.
Again Nero, PROOF; something Andre provides; has eluded you.
Hint here Nero,
Provide PROOF with your statements; or expect to get flamed; AGAIN.

Jeff
 
Really?
It's easy to import RTM icons;there's a zipped pack in the wild now, but
look close; cuz there's more to it than just a couple of icon changes.
And Nero said "leaked", unless MSFT changed 5840s build string, those
aren't screenies of the "leaked" 5840 either.

Jeff

SpeedKing said:
He was talking about 5840 that was floating around the net before Vista
went RTM.
There were two versions(different build numbers)and one that was
not"leaked"had a few different icons.
Alexander Suhovey said:
-----Original Message-----
From: Nero [mailto:[email protected]]
Posted At: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:13 PM
Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
Conversation: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop

Other than motion desktop, ALL those are part of Vista ultimate
Click to expand...
5840(leaked)

Is the '(leaked)' an official part of build name?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
note the red text

From: "Nero" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:13:07 -0000
Lines: 14
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 <--nero is using this not 5840
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-69-113-79.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 82.69.113.79
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:132425
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0647-0, 09/11/2006), Inbound message
 
-----Original Message-----
From: SpeedKing [mailto:[email protected]]
Posted At: Friday, November 10, 2006 1:11 PM
Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
Conversation: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop

He was talking about 5840 that was floating around the net
before Vista went
RTM.
There were two versions(different build numbers)and one that was
not"leaked"had a few different icons.
Click to expand...

Thanks, I know that. It supposed to be a joke :-).
 
Its build 6000, but they are PR screenshots from Microsoft. Notice they .PNG
screenshots.
 
Will,
I know, look at my first post to him.
I just wanted him to get the point.
Pawned-again!!
lol

Jeff
note the red text

From: "Nero" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:13:07 -0000
Lines: 14
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 <--nero is using this not 5840
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-69-113-79.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 82.69.113.79
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:132425
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0647-0, 09/11/2006), Inbound message
 
Why don't you piss off JEFF you pain in the ass.
Told enough time YOU prove I am NOT using VISTA.
Fekkin knowitall
 
lol
not a know it all-know where to look- to see your posting not using
Vista.(still-btw)
Been nice about it, but if you insist
here ya go

From: "Nero" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:44:00 -0000
Lines: 40
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <#[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general

Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:132530

Why don't you piss off JEFF you pain in the ass.
Told enough time YOU prove I am NOT using VISTA.
Fekkin knowitall

lol
Hmm,
Last I looked; Outlook Express ISN'T in ANY Vista build
PROOF NERO-from you. LOL
lol

Jeff
 
Nero:
Being a thin skinned troll are two non-complimentary faults. I'll
make it simple for you. All that's being said is that if you have build 5840
post in this group using it. Like I said it's very simple.
 
So I don't use /have 5840 then???
Funny, it says build 5480 on the desktop
Well what I do not have is RC1 or RC2 so it must be 5480 then.
 
So I don't have or use 5480 then............

Will,
I know, look at my first post to him.
I just wanted him to get the point.
Pawned-again!!
lol

Jeff
note the red text

From: "Nero" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:13:07 -0000
Lines: 14
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 <--nero is using
this not 5840
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-69-113-79.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 82.69.113.79
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:132425
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0647-0, 09/11/2006), Inbound message
 
Ha!
what a prat you are.
note the red text

From: "Nero" <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New WinVI Screenies - Windows Motion Desktop
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:13:07 -0000
Lines: 14
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 <--nero is using this
not 5840
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-69-113-79.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 82.69.113.79
Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.vista.general:132425
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0647-0, 09/11/2006), Inbound message
 
ahh-
lol- Now you decide to post using 5840-
BIG DEAL
Wanna impress me?
lol?
wastin time nero-ya lost ALL credibility before--
yur nothin but annoyin now.
 
Back
Top