P
Pete
Hi, I've recently downloaded and installed MSAS, since for
a long time I've managed without any antispyware. The last
time I ever used any was about 2 yrs ago, when I gave up on
Adaware because it kept finding 100s of definitions at a
time and I eventually ended up deleting things I shouldn't
have and so corrupted my Registry. I'm therefore terribly
wary of ANY utility that claims to be antispyware. However,
some recent and very regular but unknown input/output
activity from my PC, in the direction of my router, caused
me a rethink and hence I've installed MSAS Beta.
I've fully configured MSAS and run a full scan three times,
rebooting at least once, but MSAS has found absolutely
nothing that it regards as spyware. I accept the point that
MSAS is not designed to find cookies, tracking cookies or
data-mining objects, but I'm still puzzled by the zero
result. Mind you, my last hard disk reformat and complete
reinstall was only about 6 weeks ago, I install only bona
fide applications and utilities, and am very strict with
myself as to the kinds of websites I visit and the links I
click on. I also run a tight ship as regards antivirus
(AVG7) and software firewall (Zone Alarm), and I use
Firefox for 99.9% of the time. My ADSL router also has NAT
firewalling, which keeps out most unwanted inward connections.
Before I installed MSAS, I ran Netstat and it turned up a
couple of suspicious, but blocked,outward attempts. I
haven't got the names of these to hand right at present but
I'll post them here very shortly. The point is that someone
on another forum maintained that those two attempts were
known blacklisted spyware processes. And yet MSAS hasn't
now picked them up. Either they weren't genuine spyware or
perhaps those two processes happen to hide themselves well.
In the meantime, I've a couple of questions to pose:
1) Is anyone on this forum familiar with the popular
antivirus client AVG7, as AVG has been known to
occasionally (and legitimately, it seems) modify one or two
files in Windows' shell area. I notice that MSAS's
background agents will monitor any changes to Windows'
system files, so I'm wondering whether a problem might now
arise with updating AVG. If AVG is stopped from changing a
system file, eg. AVG needs to make a change to protect the
boot area, then maybe AVG will hang. What d'ya think?
2) When configuring MSAS to deep-scan folders and, in MSAS,
I open out all devices and partitions on my PC in order to
check(tick) them, I'm unable to see all of them. This
appears to be a bug in the way that that particular
configuration box is displayed. The area just above where
A: is shown is cut off and I suspect there's a further
checkable box there that I can't get to. Also, the various
partition letters are skewed with respect to their
checkable boxes, so it's difficult to actually know which
ones I'm approving. Does anyone else have this problem? I'm
viewing on a 20" monitor, running at 1600 X 1200, under
Firefox, and with a customised Firefox font.
Watch this posting, as I'll be back shortly with the names
of those two processes that Netstat showed. I'll want your
opinion of them.
a long time I've managed without any antispyware. The last
time I ever used any was about 2 yrs ago, when I gave up on
Adaware because it kept finding 100s of definitions at a
time and I eventually ended up deleting things I shouldn't
have and so corrupted my Registry. I'm therefore terribly
wary of ANY utility that claims to be antispyware. However,
some recent and very regular but unknown input/output
activity from my PC, in the direction of my router, caused
me a rethink and hence I've installed MSAS Beta.
I've fully configured MSAS and run a full scan three times,
rebooting at least once, but MSAS has found absolutely
nothing that it regards as spyware. I accept the point that
MSAS is not designed to find cookies, tracking cookies or
data-mining objects, but I'm still puzzled by the zero
result. Mind you, my last hard disk reformat and complete
reinstall was only about 6 weeks ago, I install only bona
fide applications and utilities, and am very strict with
myself as to the kinds of websites I visit and the links I
click on. I also run a tight ship as regards antivirus
(AVG7) and software firewall (Zone Alarm), and I use
Firefox for 99.9% of the time. My ADSL router also has NAT
firewalling, which keeps out most unwanted inward connections.
Before I installed MSAS, I ran Netstat and it turned up a
couple of suspicious, but blocked,outward attempts. I
haven't got the names of these to hand right at present but
I'll post them here very shortly. The point is that someone
on another forum maintained that those two attempts were
known blacklisted spyware processes. And yet MSAS hasn't
now picked them up. Either they weren't genuine spyware or
perhaps those two processes happen to hide themselves well.
In the meantime, I've a couple of questions to pose:
1) Is anyone on this forum familiar with the popular
antivirus client AVG7, as AVG has been known to
occasionally (and legitimately, it seems) modify one or two
files in Windows' shell area. I notice that MSAS's
background agents will monitor any changes to Windows'
system files, so I'm wondering whether a problem might now
arise with updating AVG. If AVG is stopped from changing a
system file, eg. AVG needs to make a change to protect the
boot area, then maybe AVG will hang. What d'ya think?
2) When configuring MSAS to deep-scan folders and, in MSAS,
I open out all devices and partitions on my PC in order to
check(tick) them, I'm unable to see all of them. This
appears to be a bug in the way that that particular
configuration box is displayed. The area just above where
A: is shown is cut off and I suspect there's a further
checkable box there that I can't get to. Also, the various
partition letters are skewed with respect to their
checkable boxes, so it's difficult to actually know which
ones I'm approving. Does anyone else have this problem? I'm
viewing on a 20" monitor, running at 1600 X 1200, under
Firefox, and with a customised Firefox font.
Watch this posting, as I'll be back shortly with the names
of those two processes that Netstat showed. I'll want your
opinion of them.