new EasyCleaner version?

  • Thread starter Thread starter D. Wilson
  • Start date Start date
D

D. Wilson

Hi,
I have a magazine CD with the new free "EasyCleaner 2" version on it
(by ToniArts). Wondered if anyone here has tried this and what
advantages it has over the original version? TIA, Denise.
 
Hi,
I have a magazine CD with the new free "EasyCleaner 2" version on it
(by ToniArts). Wondered if anyone here has tried this and what
advantages it has over the original version? TIA, Denise.
Click to expand...

From the website.

EasyCleaner 2.0 BETA 1
Yep here it is! Due to the time limit I'll make this short. I'm in the
army now for a whole year and I get home very rarely. Suprisingly I have
managed to actually do something. This BETA haven't been 110% tested like
it should but it should work better that the 1.7f release especially in
Windows XP/ME. This release SHOULD be totally harmless in Windows
NT/2000/XP and Windows 95/98/ME.

Clean registry - 100% done!
Add/remove cleaner - 95% done! Missing status-thing (= "OK, Not sure,
Does not exist")
Duplicate file finder - 100% done! I got a low memory error from it once
but go a head and try, should be ok.
Unnecessary file finder - 99% done! May list files more than once, it
doesn't really know what folders it has searched previously (not a big
problem).
Start menu cleaner - 90% done! Not touched since 1.7f, but should be made
more wisely...
Drive charting - 90% done! Not touched since 1.7f, but should be made
more wisely...
Undo - 99% done! Doesn't read binary (not really have to, but it makes me
feel better if it can).
 
Can you please list the current
url since the old url does not exit.
Thanks.



Hi,
I have a magazine CD with the new free "EasyCleaner 2" version on it
(by ToniArts). Wondered if anyone here has tried this and what
advantages it has over the original version? TIA, Denise.
Click to expand...

From the website.

EasyCleaner 2.0 BETA 1
Yep here it is! Due to the time limit I'll make this short. I'm in the
army now for a whole year and I get home very rarely. Suprisingly I have
managed to actually do something. This BETA haven't been 110% tested like
it should but it should work better that the 1.7f release especially in
Windows XP/ME. This release SHOULD be totally harmless in Windows
NT/2000/XP and Windows 95/98/ME.

Clean registry - 100% done!
Add/remove cleaner - 95% done! Missing status-thing (= "OK, Not sure,
Does not exist")
Duplicate file finder - 100% done! I got a low memory error from it once
but go a head and try, should be ok.
Unnecessary file finder - 99% done! May list files more than once, it
doesn't really know what folders it has searched previously (not a big
problem).
Start menu cleaner - 90% done! Not touched since 1.7f, but should be made
more wisely...
Drive charting - 90% done! Not touched since 1.7f, but should be made
more wisely...
Undo - 99% done! Doesn't read binary (not really have to, but it makes me
feel better if it can).
 
http://www.toniarts.com/betas.htm
Click to expand...

I'm not under the impression that this is new, though, other than
being the most recent version. As the programmer's personal pages say,
Toni is in the army now and hasn't much time to work on it any more.
The initial version came out when he was 15, and I believe he is now
nineteen. Heck of an accomplishment!
 
Hi,
I have a magazine CD with the new free "EasyCleaner 2" version on it
(by ToniArts). Wondered if anyone here has tried this and what
advantages it has over the original version? TIA, Denise.
Click to expand...
I tried the new Beta a couple of months ago and the registry cleaner gave
me problems which endure to this day. The restore did nothing to fix the
problems which are not catastrophic just annoying program close downs. I
seem to remember this happening once before with the previous release
version. Maybe it's a little too "cleansing". I will stick to the last
JV16 for the time being which seems more reliable. I also have Regseeker
which seems OK but I haven't used it much. Any other opinions?
 
Jules Baby said:
I tried the new Beta a couple of months ago and the registry cleaner gave
me problems which endure to this day. The restore did nothing to fix the
problems which are not catastrophic just annoying program close downs. I
seem to remember this happening once before with the previous release
version. Maybe it's a little too "cleansing". I will stick to the last
JV16 for the time being which seems more reliable. I also have Regseeker
which seems OK but I haven't used it much. Any other opinions?
Click to expand...

Odd how different set-ups have different problems. I have never had
anything wrong with East Cleaner in nearly 5 years, both the old and
newer version. It never has seemed overly aggressive in its approach to
me.
 
Maureen said:
I'm not under the impression that this is new, though, other than
being the most recent version. As the programmer's personal pages say,
Toni is in the army now and hasn't much time to work on it any more.
The initial version came out when he was 15, and I believe he is now
nineteen. Heck of an accomplishment!
Click to expand...

I believe Jouni of JV16 fame falls into much the same boat. The army
seems to have taught him to go commercial and chase the dollar though
;-). Let's hope Toni is trained in a different corps!
 
I'm not under the impression that this is new, though,
Click to expand...

< snip >

I agree. I would hope that the beta would be a lot better than the
original. IIRC the original duplicate finder was one of the worst, if
not the worst, I had ever come across. If used on a "whole drive"
search.

Regards, John.
 
John Fitzsimons said:
< snip >

I agree. I would hope that the beta would be a lot better than the
original. IIRC the original duplicate finder was one of the worst, if
not the worst, I had ever come across. If used on a "whole drive"
search.
Click to expand...
God, no kidding. It would take far longer to process than years I have
left to live. I never use it.
 
Mister said:
God, no kidding. It would take far longer to process than years I
have left to live. I never use it.
Click to expand...

LOL! That's a great line. I'll "lift" it if it's not copyrighted. :)
I remember there was a Find Dupes or similar program, possibly from PC
Mag, that did a very good job locating dupes - not just by attributes,
but by actual content. Ah! Dupeless - that was it.
 
Alan said:
LOL! That's a great line. I'll "lift" it if it's not copyrighted. :)
Click to expand...

Be my guest, tho in re-reading it I think it could be grammatically
structured to parse better.
 
Back
Top