J
Jim Howes
On a windows 2000 professional system we have a number of shares
GeneralData
Public
RestrictedData
PhoneLog
Of these, RestrictedData has the more restrictive of access permissions, in that
only certain named users have any sort of access.
The local security policy is unchanged from the default. There is no domain.
The problem is that one particular computer (running Windows 98 SE) cannot see
\\machine\RestrictedData in the list of available shares via explorer, but can
both map \\machine\RestrictedData to a drive, and can browse to
\\machine\RestrictedData via shortcuts and typing the UNC path into the address
bar in explorer.
When mapped, the user credentials, as viewed via compmgmt.msc's 'Open Files'
panel show that files are being correctly accessed as the user concerned.
For some reason, this has become a critical issue (despite being a complete
non-issue for me and all of the other members of staff concerned) for one
particular manager, and I need to GET IT SORTED NOW! OR ELSE.
(Naturally, I am treating this with the priority it obviously deserves, just
below watching grass grow, paint dry, watching pots boil, and trying to get a
truthful answer out of a politician)
I am wondering, however, if it has something to do with the length of the share
name.
Jim
GeneralData
Public
RestrictedData
PhoneLog
Of these, RestrictedData has the more restrictive of access permissions, in that
only certain named users have any sort of access.
The local security policy is unchanged from the default. There is no domain.
The problem is that one particular computer (running Windows 98 SE) cannot see
\\machine\RestrictedData in the list of available shares via explorer, but can
both map \\machine\RestrictedData to a drive, and can browse to
\\machine\RestrictedData via shortcuts and typing the UNC path into the address
bar in explorer.
When mapped, the user credentials, as viewed via compmgmt.msc's 'Open Files'
panel show that files are being correctly accessed as the user concerned.
For some reason, this has become a critical issue (despite being a complete
non-issue for me and all of the other members of staff concerned) for one
particular manager, and I need to GET IT SORTED NOW! OR ELSE.
(Naturally, I am treating this with the priority it obviously deserves, just
below watching grass grow, paint dry, watching pots boil, and trying to get a
truthful answer out of a politician)
I am wondering, however, if it has something to do with the length of the share
name.
Jim