L
Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
I have seen this question posted on the web but I can't seem to find a
definite answer for this.
What is the thinking behind switching the order of version numbers from
what, at least I, consider to be the norm?
ie. this is what I expect:
major.minor.revision.build
and this is how .NET specifies them:
major.minor.build.revision
What is the point/description of build and revision in this?
My thinking, which just plain looks wrong, goes something like this:
"Each time I build I increase the revision number, and each time I
release a revision I increase the build number".
Should I use the numbers another way?
definite answer for this.
What is the thinking behind switching the order of version numbers from
what, at least I, consider to be the norm?
ie. this is what I expect:
major.minor.revision.build
and this is how .NET specifies them:
major.minor.build.revision
What is the point/description of build and revision in this?
My thinking, which just plain looks wrong, goes something like this:
"Each time I build I increase the revision number, and each time I
release a revision I increase the build number".
Should I use the numbers another way?