.net frame work 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omar Abid
  • Start date Start date
O

Omar Abid

Hi,
Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3
And does program made with vb2005 .net 2 works on windows vista
And can i make compatibility of vb2005 with the .net 3
Omar Abid
 
Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3

..Net 3.0 = .Net2.0 + WPF + WCF + a few others
And does program made with vb2005 .net 2 works on windows vista
Yes

And can i make compatibility of vb2005 with the .net 3
Click to expand...

Sorry I'm not sure I understand this one.

Possibly you mean "Can I code against .Net 3.0 with VS2005?"

If so then the answer is yes although you will likely need the November CTP
of the VS2005 Extentionsfor some bits.

I don't have a lot of knowledge in this area, perhaps someone else can fill
in the blanks.
 
.Net 3.0 = .Net2.0 + WPF + WCF + a few others


Sorry I'm not sure I understand this one.

Possibly you mean "Can I code against .Net 3.0 with VS2005?"

If so then the answer is yes although you will likely need the November CTP
of the VS2005 Extentionsfor some bits.

I don't have a lot of knowledge in this area, perhaps someone else can fill
in the blanks.
Click to expand...

Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead of
version 2 in programing with vb2005
Omar Abid
 
Omar said:
Does any one know the difference between .net 2 and .net 3
Click to expand...

dotNet_3 = dotNet_2 + Whizzo_Vista_specific_classes
And does program made with vb2005 .net 2 works on windows vista
Click to expand...

VB2005 /SP1/, yes.
And can i make compatibility of vb2005 with the .net 3
Click to expand...

Just add references to the "new" bits you want to use.

HTH,
Phill W.
 
Omar Abid said:
Thx 4 reply what i want is that can i use .net frame work 3 instead of
version 2 in programing with vb2005
Click to expand...

Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of .NET
2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some additional
class libraries, which you can reference from within your projects.
 
Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of .NET
2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some additional
class libraries, which you can reference from within your projects.
Click to expand...

and can i use those new libraries ?
 
Omar Abid said:
Yes and no. The programming languages and libraries which are part of
.NET 2.0 have not changed with .NET 3.0. .NET 3.0 simply adds some
additional class libraries, which you can reference from within your
projects.
Click to expand...

I don't understand why part of your answer is No. The simple fact is that
if .net 3.0 SDK is installed then he can reference the libraries it contains
from VS2005 (albeit with SP1 installed as Phil pointed out)
 
what r those tools ??
Click to expand...

Windows Communications Framework (Remoting Replacement)
Windows Presentation Foundation (New GUI framework)
Windows WorkFlow Foundation (Workflow engine)
Windows CardSpaces (Security Framework)
 
Rory said:
I don't understand why part of your answer is No. The simple fact is
that if .net 3.0 SDK is installed then he can reference the libraries it
contains from VS2005 (albeit with SP1 installed as Phil pointed out)
Click to expand...

I suppose that the "no" part is that you can't use VB.NET 3.0 instead of
VB.NET 2.0 in .NET framework 3.0, because .NET framework 3.0 still uses
VB.NET 2.0.
 
I suppose that the "no" part is that you can't use VB.NET 3.0 instead of
VB.NET 2.0 in .NET framework 3.0, because .NET framework 3.0 still uses
VB.NET 2.0.
Click to expand...

but you suppose !! I want to know if Microsoft has sure things about
that
 
Omar said:
but you suppose !! I want to know if Microsoft has sure things about
that
Click to expand...

I suppose that's what Herfried ment when writing "Yes and no".

That fact that .NET framework 3.0 uses VB.NET 2.0 is certainly a fact.
 
I agree with Göran entirely.

Fact 1: 3.0 contains and extends 2.0 whilst still running on the same CLR

My only question was regarding how the answer to the OP's question could
be even slightly No.

I believe Göran's supposition was regarding what Herfied meant by 'No'.

He was not supposing about Fact 1 (above).
 
I agree with Göran entirely.

Fact 1: 3.0 contains and extends 2.0 whilst still running on the same CLR

My only question was regarding how the answer to the OP's question could
be even slightly No.

I believe Göran's supposition was regarding what Herfied meant by 'No'.

He was not supposing about Fact 1 (above).
Click to expand...

Ok, the best solution is to install .net 3 and try it my self
 
Omar said:
but if i use .net 3 the program will need it to work ?
Click to expand...

If you use any of the libraries that was added in .NET 3, your program
will need .NET 3 to run.
 
Back
Top