G
Guest
Can version 2.0 of the .net framework be used by Visual Studio 2003?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
P
Philipp Schumann
I doubt it...
W
Willy Denoyette [MVP]
JAG711 said:Can version 2.0 of the .net framework be used by Visual Studio 2003?
No, v2.0 needs vs2005.
Willy.
T
Teemu Keiski
VS2003 compiles for v1.1, you can't change that (limits the feature set to
that of v1.1 when relying vs's intellisense etc), however applications built
with it probably work under v2.0 fine (in limits of breaking changes in
moving from v1.1 to v.2.0)
But to fully use 2.0 with a IDE, you'd need vs2005.
that of v1.1 when relying vs's intellisense etc), however applications built
with it probably work under v2.0 fine (in limits of breaking changes in
moving from v1.1 to v.2.0)
But to fully use 2.0 with a IDE, you'd need vs2005.
P
Philipp Schumann
Strange though that MS find it so difficult to target multiple frameworks...
in the end, VS is a generic workbench type of application, isn't it? Can't
they just wrap everything platform-version-specific in interfaces and that'd
be it?
Granted, that probably would sell less copies of a new VS version.
in the end, VS is a generic workbench type of application, isn't it? Can't
they just wrap everything platform-version-specific in interfaces and that'd
be it?
Granted, that probably would sell less copies of a new VS version.
S
Sean Hederman
Philipp Schumann said:Strange though that MS find it so difficult to target multiple
frameworks... in the end, VS is a generic workbench type of application,
isn't it? Can't they just wrap everything platform-version-specific in
interfaces and that'd be it?
Granted, that probably would sell less copies of a new VS version.
That's probably *exactly* why.