B. said:
I hold the negatives by the edge but find it difficult not to touch
the image with all the fiddling around with these type of pages (I
find it hard to slide the film in or out smoothly). Are there some
companies products better than others?
I use Jessops ring binder page type (plastic on one side, tracing
paper like on the other), each row holding strips of 6. I make sure
the film is dry from processing but with my grip on [just the]
non-image part of the last picture it fights me all the way - wretched
stuff (it'll be after my tea next).
If there was a better way to store the strips (or, indeed a whole roll
intact) I'd be game for it..
As long as the roll isn't longer than 15m (*some* rollfilm backs take
220ft or more!) then you could have a look at:
http://www.secol.co.uk/SLEEVEROLLS.HTM
I have never used this particular type, so I can't comment on ease of
use, but I used something similar about 20 years ago for convenience and
that stuff could even be rolled with the film.. sort of roll your own
negative storage.
Actually, I have been on the opposite quest since I have most of my film
processed commercially these days and a lot of places cut the film into
strips of 4 frames, not 6. This is slightly less convenient for
scanning but I have found the slightly diffuse polythene sleeves they
use to be far better than any of the "pro" type clear storage sheets for
the reason you give too - easier to get the film in and out only
touching the edges. Also, by sticking a ringbinder clasp down one side
they fit perfectly well into a conventional four ring A4 binder which I
interleave with "contact" sheets, that are archived with the content via
a referencing system on a data base for quick and easy retrieval.
Problem is, I would like to get a roll of this polythene sheeting so
that I can transfer a lot of my old uncut rolls into the more convenient
storage and archive method.
I even tried writing to Boots in Nottingham (I accidentally discovered
that Boots stores use these sleeves to return negatives these days) but
they couldn't or wouldn't supply them or provide details of where they
procure them. :-(