Hello again,
Someone else has just pointed out to me something you say.
You appear to be under the impression that Papajohn is being called a
Liar by me in that you believe that I have said he never created the sample
video. I'm sorry, I never said that, or implied it. All I said was that its
a BOTCH-UP.
In addition, where it was shot is not relevant, or do you think it is??
As you have brought PAPAJOHN'S website into this, if you remove from
PAPAJOHN'S web site everything that someone else has said (and that includes
a lot of stuff where he has not given the posters name...by the way, some
call that sort of thing plagiarism...others more sensibly call it straight
THEFT) you end up with a few generalisations and little else. But you do
have left a couple of video examples...we have already mentioned Multi
video's in a Movie Maker project all displaying at the same time, we also
have...........
REVERSE VIDEO...he is actually suggesting that you take your piece of
video and with some other program (Because movie maker can not do this)
capture every single frame and using yet another program splice them
together in the reverse order WHAT !!! OK, so over in the states you have 30
frames a second and lets suppose you have a 10 second clip you want to
reverse...30 x 10 is ?????? 300 frames !!! but what about the audio. OK, now
lets suppose you want to vary the rate of reversed video.....no...forget it,
lets not go there.
We could always move on to the transparency one...he had me going on
that one until I realised that it was simply a dead horse, instead I first
acquired free software that did rather an excellent overall job and followed
that up by buying the Big Brother of the free stuff...at US $69 it is
totally fantastic (Its what I used to make the multi video film clip)
You will please TAKE NOTE, that I have not called him a liar. Instead I
would offer the view that all of this stuff looks good (maybe) but it is not
practical. So lets remove that from the site, what's left? You only have to
look at some of his messages of today where he talks about tuning up memory
or defrag the hard drive..I've made comments elsewhere on those suggestions.
Remember, by your own words to me, you invited comment. Do you yet wish
you had not.
Why do you think PAPAJOHN does not comment publicly. I can tell you that
he used to, quite a lot. He once implied that he was right because he posted
to no less than 52 newsgroups and an unspecified number of web based
forums...WRONG !! He once made the remark that he liked web sites that
restored themselves to service (That was just after he made an extremely
silly remark in two parts...he was safe because he was behind a router
and then implied that the program TRACERT was obviously not very good
When he was told that it was the industry De-Facto Standard he went
silent. Then he made a public statement that no one person runs this
newsgroup (I agree) but then he sent me an email stating that only one of us
could run it!!!!! I did not know what to make of that, but I did start
checking up on how many newsgroups he does post too, it took a very long
time and the answer was no where near 52! (I have every message he ever
posted using the name PAPAJOHN going back three years from when he made the
claim, there are a lot of them, believe me, but there are not many
newsgroups) He has never claimed he posted using any other name, even though
I have laid these facts before him many times.
Best Wishes.....John Kelly (Who still says its a BOTCH-UP)
www.the-kellys.org
www.the-kellys.co.uk