Per your request, I have attached the information
regarding our DNS servers.
Thank you for your assistance.
Note:
The two domain controllers currently running DNS are
identified as FS-DC-1 and DB2SERVER. There are also two
additional domain controllers that were running on our
network identified as SP1 and SP2 but they are not
currently running at this time. They are however still
listed in the Active Directory DNS listing with identical
zones.
1. WHAT OBSERVATIONS ARE YOU BASING THIS ON?
Error messages appearing on a daily basis in the DNS Event
log
2. ARE THERE ANY ERRORS ON ANY OF THE DCS' EVENT LOGS -
LOOKING FOR NTFRS, NETLOGON, KERBEROS, AND LDAP ERRORS?
Yes we have in the past but I did not find any error
messages in our log at the time of this writing that
referred to any of the entities mentioned above. I have
listed below the error message that is continually written
to the DNS event log.
Error Message on FS-DC-1:
The description for Event ID ( 7062 ) in Source ( DNS )
cannot be found. The local computer may not have the
necessary registry information or message DLL files to
display messages from a remote computer. You may be able
to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description;
see Help and Support for details. The following
information is part of the event: 10.44.1.210.
Error Message on DB2SERVER:
The description for Event ID ( 7062 ) in Source ( DNS )
cannot be found. The local computer may not have the
necessary registry information or message DLL files to
display messages from a remote computer. You may be able
to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description;
see Help and Support for details. The following
information is part of the event: 10.44.1.18.
3. PLEASE POST FROM EACH DC AN UNEDITED IPCONFIG/ALL
IPCONFIG For DB2SERVER
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.
H:\>IPCONFIG /ALL
Windows 2000 IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : db2server
Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . : ilptab.il.us
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : ilptab.il.us
il.us
Ethernet adapter Springfield Primary 10.44.1.18:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R)
PRO/100+ Server Adapter (PI
LA8470B)
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-E0-18-29-B8-
E1
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.44.1.18
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.44.1.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.44.1.18
10.44.1.210
IPCONFIG For FS-DC-1
-----Original Message-----
I work for a small state agency that only has thirty users
that can possibly be logged on at any given time. We
currently have three domain controllers running on our
network and all of them have their own copy of DNS
installed. It was my belief at the time I set this
network up that this approach would add redundancy to our
network and allow for a failure of one of the servers w/o
bringing down the entire network. In addition, I also
felt that this would provide some load balancing and help
keep the network running faster and smoother. I have
recently been having some second thoughts on that
strategy. It seems that some of the DNS servers are not
synchronizing with the other servers on the network. Can
somebody tell me if I was correct in using this approach
or would it have been better off to only have one server
running DNS since our agency is so small?
.