B
Bruce Scherzinger
This happens in Windows 2000, but not Windows 98.
I have an Access 97 database macro that outputs a report to a text
file. Afterwards, it runs a DOS batch procedure to do some
post-processing (blank line removal and conversion to Unix format).
The batch procedure cannot see the file, even though it is clearly
there. I have enabled echo so I can see what's going on, verify the
execution location, and even added a check for existence of the file
(originally, it was just trying to manipulate it). Neither the "if
exist" or "copy" command sees the file.
I can open a DOS box manually and run the same batch procedure and it
works fine, even with Access still running; so it would not appear to
be a permission thing. It's only the spawned process that cannot see
the file.
What's up with that?
Thanks in advance,
Bruce
Vienna, VA
I have an Access 97 database macro that outputs a report to a text
file. Afterwards, it runs a DOS batch procedure to do some
post-processing (blank line removal and conversion to Unix format).
The batch procedure cannot see the file, even though it is clearly
there. I have enabled echo so I can see what's going on, verify the
execution location, and even added a check for existence of the file
(originally, it was just trying to manipulate it). Neither the "if
exist" or "copy" command sees the file.
I can open a DOS box manually and run the same batch procedure and it
works fine, even with Access still running; so it would not appear to
be a permission thing. It's only the spawned process that cannot see
the file.
What's up with that?
Thanks in advance,
Bruce
Vienna, VA