J
John Corliss
I've been wanting to upgrade to a newer version of Mozilla for some
time, but unless you take certain measures in advance, that's a
tedious process that *can* (note: not necessarily *will*) easily
result in your losing such things as your bookmark collection and any
saved email. There is a dearth of information about upgrading Moz
versions in a way to prevent this kind of loss, but I did find:
http://www.mozilla.org/start/1.0/faq/general.html#1.2
and this:
http://mozilla.gunnars.net/mozfaq_use.html
(scroll down to "Upgrading:")
and this:
http://www.aezula.com/bloggy/archives/000064.html
When I recently upgraded IE from version 5.5 to 6, the process was
effortless and kept all my settings as well as the favorites (note
that I don't use IE unless I absolutely must though.) In contrast, the
upgrading process for Mozilla is a real pain in the neck.
To a certain degree, it's understandable why they're doing this. Total
uninstalls of older versions leads to clean installs of nightly builds
for developers. This prevents spurious bugs.
In that vein, I realize Mozilla is not supposed to be an "end user
product", but because of the forthcoming demise of Netscape, the
people who are running the project need to think about such obstacles
to easy usage of their *final versions*. Their funding could improve
if more new people started using the non-alpha/beta versions of their
program because of easier upgrading.
And yes, I did post this to as well.
--
Regards from John Corliss
alt.comp.freeware F.A.Q.:
http://www.ccountry.net/~jcorliss/F.A.Q./FrameSet1.html
Note that I can't see any of Andy Mabbett's troll posts
because I have him killfiled.
time, but unless you take certain measures in advance, that's a
tedious process that *can* (note: not necessarily *will*) easily
result in your losing such things as your bookmark collection and any
saved email. There is a dearth of information about upgrading Moz
versions in a way to prevent this kind of loss, but I did find:
http://www.mozilla.org/start/1.0/faq/general.html#1.2
and this:
http://mozilla.gunnars.net/mozfaq_use.html
(scroll down to "Upgrading:")
and this:
http://www.aezula.com/bloggy/archives/000064.html
When I recently upgraded IE from version 5.5 to 6, the process was
effortless and kept all my settings as well as the favorites (note
that I don't use IE unless I absolutely must though.) In contrast, the
upgrading process for Mozilla is a real pain in the neck.
To a certain degree, it's understandable why they're doing this. Total
uninstalls of older versions leads to clean installs of nightly builds
for developers. This prevents spurious bugs.
In that vein, I realize Mozilla is not supposed to be an "end user
product", but because of the forthcoming demise of Netscape, the
people who are running the project need to think about such obstacles
to easy usage of their *final versions*. Their funding could improve
if more new people started using the non-alpha/beta versions of their
program because of easier upgrading.
And yes, I did post this to as well.
--
Regards from John Corliss
alt.comp.freeware F.A.Q.:
http://www.ccountry.net/~jcorliss/F.A.Q./FrameSet1.html
Note that I can't see any of Andy Mabbett's troll posts
because I have him killfiled.