more drives

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert de Vos
  • Start date Start date
R

Robert de Vos

Maybe this is a really stupid question:

But why is it only scanning my C partition ?
My hard drive has C: D: E: (because i am old fashioned)

Robert (Netherlands)
 
I think you are doing an "intelligent quickscan"?

If you modify the scan options, there's a button to the right of the drive
letter to choose to scan all the drives. I do this on my machine.
 
Bill said:
I think you are doing an "intelligent quickscan"?

If you modify the scan options, there's a button to the right of the drive
letter to choose to scan all the drives. I do this on my machine.

Oeps now that you have mention it. But it is not very visible.

Anyway thanx

Robert (Netherlands)
 
Bill said:
Expect some changes in the UI in the beta2 build....

I hope not to many, i like the ui already.

ps it is so fast.... I had my doubts if it has scanned all drives, but
at a closer look is did :)
 
The UI is interesting--I hope they will be able to maintain the
flavor--there's substantial work to be done for accessibility, though--don't
know what will be possible.

I don't find it terribly fast on my system--37-39 minutes for a full scan of
3 (small) partitions. It does examine relatively few files--many fewer than
a full antivirus scan.
 
Bill said:
The UI is interesting--I hope they will be able to maintain the
flavor--there's substantial work to be done for accessibility, though--don't
know what will be possible.

I see in the help files about firewalls wrong names to put in the
trusted sites. But mayby it is grammar :)
Also at "your" site http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

Or am i wrong ?
I don't find it terribly fast on my system--37-39 minutes for a full scan of
3 (small) partitions. It does examine relatively few files--many fewer than
a full antivirus scan.

4 minutes.... and thats fast. But i am not a disk-filler :)

Robert (Netherlands)
 
The help file is being actively worked on--i.e. it changed between build
..501 and .509--so we should call their attention to an error in that firewal
information section. I hadn't noticed it!

I don't maintain the FAQ--that's Mark Ferguson's contribution. Some of it
is "as contributed"--but there's no reason it couldn't be polished--what did
you notice?
 
I see what you mean about the firewall documentation in the Help--and it is
different between .501 and .509--but both are wrong for the current state of
the product--harbingers of things to come, I suspect.
 
Bill said:
The help file is being actively worked on--i.e. it changed between build
.501 and .509--so we should call their attention to an error in that firewal
information section. I hadn't noticed it!

I don't maintain the FAQ--that's Mark Ferguson's contribution. Some of it
is "as contributed"--but there's no reason it couldn't be polished--what did
you notice?

---FAQ---
GiantAntiSpywareMain.exe
gcasDtServ.exe
MicrosoftAntiSpywareUpdater.exe <------------
gcasServAlert.exe
---FAQ---

---DIR---
10-02-2005 22:32 752.456 gcasDtServ.exe
10-02-2005 22:32 838.472 gcasServAlert.exe
10-02-2005 22:32 4.586.320 GIANTAntiSpywareMain.exe
10-02-2005 22:32 191.312 GIANTAntiSpywareUpdater.exe <----
---DIR---

Its a difference.

Robert (Netherlands)
 
Back
Top