Hmm, first the university was wrong in not taking back the unopened
package, then M$ reneged on taking it back, apparently maybe within their
stated time period, then the lawyers went nuts with false accusations - I
wonder what the final settlement came out at?.
The guy was right to try to sell it but he *did* violate the rules by
selling academic priced software on the general market. I thought many
academic insitutions had mechanisms in place to resell used materials like
textbooks - no?
The thing I find interesting here is that M$ had a lawyer, this Chudakoff
creep in Cleveland, who was "local" to take up the cudgel for them. Is
this coincidence or does this mean M$ has lawyers on retainer all over the
place ready to pounce on us at the local level?
