Steve said:
"CPU Cooling
Utilizes massive copper blocks and six 6mm diameter copper heatpipes to
transfer up to 150W of heat. Sockets K8, 775 and 478 are supported. Recommended
for use with P4-478 up to 2.8C (Northwood), all Pentium M (479) models, A64-939
up to 3500+ (Winchester/Venice), and Sempron 754 up to 3300+ (Palermo)."
It looks like you're shit out of luck.
s
Then maybe a Core2 Quad, like a Q9650 with the LGA775 socket, would be
the closest next thing to use.
You would need to compare the mechanical details of the LGA775 mounting,
versus the others. The four mounting holes could have a
different spacing, which may prevent the Zalman cooler block
from fitting properly. There are no dimensions in the Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA1366
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1156
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_775
OK, found some center to center dimensions here.
http://www.nordichardware.com/Reviews/?page=4&skrivelse=559
Socket: Dimensions:
LGA775 72x72mm
LGA1156 75x75mm
LGA1366 80x80mm
Page 11 here shows the TNN300 uses a replacement retention frame.
Four screws hold the retention frame. Two "finger bolts" hold
the cooling block, using a retention bracket. The mechanical
details would be different, if you wanted to use LGA1156 or LGA1366.
http://www.frozencpu.com/images/products/pdf/cst-342.pdf
The X-Y datum for the video card socket, is probably common from
one microATX to another. I think they're expecting a PCI Express
motherboard. The mounting hole pattern around the GPU would
have to match one of the two patterns shown in the manual.
The page here, recommends a processor up to 67W, based on
Zalman's recommendations. And the video card is probably
closer to 60W or so.
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article302-page4.html
The best match for that, would be the Q9550S processor for LGA775.
It is a 65W processor. You pay more, for a lower power processor.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115210
The video card has to be able to be disassembled, and the new
cooling parts fitted like this.
http://www.silentpcreview.com/files/images/tnn300/vga4.jpg
This is the back side of a 9600GT. It draws 60W.
http://images17.newegg.com/is/image/newegg/14-125-273-S04?$S640W$
This is the back side of a 9800GT. I don't know the power for
this one right off hand. You can see the position of the GPU
is shifted a bit. But maybe the center to center hole spacing
is similar to a 6600.
http://images17.newegg.com/is/image/newegg/14-130-440-S04?$S640W$
And this is the back of a 6600GT. You'll have to flip this
180 degrees, to compare it to the others. It is pretty hard
to do this visually, but it looks like the center to center
spacing on this one, is smaller than the other cards.
http://images17.newegg.com/is/image/newegg/14-127-147-S03?$S640W$
This is doubly hard to do, when the page Zalman quoted in the manual,
is no longer available. And web.archive.org doesn't have a copy.
Contact the people at Zalman and ask them to provide the details
promised.
http://www.zalman.co.kr/product/TNN300.html
Good luck,
Paul