G said:
Any one more......
I just read a review for this HD would it work ok in my Asus P5B mobo?
Seagate 7200.10 320GB SATAII/300 8.5ms 7200RPM 16MB Cache
The Seagate drive should work fine. SATA is backward compatible, so a
300MB/sec interface should also work at 150MB/sec. Some drives come with a
jumper position, that allows manually forcing 150MB/sec, if needed.
The cache on the hard drive controller, seems to be for the most part,
irrelevant. At least, if I look at a big chart of benchmark numbers,
the 8MB and 16MB drives are kinda mixed on the chart. So there isn't a
strong trend there that I can see.
ESATA is the external version of SATA, and is still SATA at heart.
All three standards (ATA133, SATA, ESATA) are faster than the sustained
media rate on the drive. The drive might manage 60-70MB/sec at the
beginning of the disk. The only advantage the higher speed gives you,
is the ability to fill the cache on the controller faster. And the
benchmarks don't seem to show much practical advantage to that.
What does help disks, is faster RPMs. The average desktop disk is
7200RPM. One of the Raptors is 10000 RPM. The higher RPM rate allows
the seek time to be reduced (since, on average, you wait a half
revolution for the data to be underneath the head). There are faster
disks yet, at 15000 RPM, but those have SCSI interfaces on them, and
SCSI controllers tend to be an expensive way to improve on the seek
time. There is seldom practical justification on a desktop, for
such an expensive disk and controller board. SCSI is a multidrop bus,
and it allows multiple drives to share the same 320MB/sec bandwidth.
SATA is just so much cheaper to use, that SCSI is only a dream.
As for the ports on your motherboard, the ATA133 is handy for some
cheap non-SATA CDRW or DVD writer you happen to buy. SATA is for the
hard drives and is plenty good enough.
Paul