Mark All as Read

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom Lake
  • Start date Start date
T

Tom Lake

Is it just my system or does using Mark All as Read take an
awfully long time in Windows Mail? In XP, Outlook Express marks
all messages as read almost instantaneously. Windows Mail takes
twenty to thirty seconds to mark just two or three messages!

Tom Lake
 
Seeing as how there are two threads here that are about 100 deep, which
threads are you trying to mark as read.

I am not seeing your problem. But then, I reset my folders every month and
start fresh in each group. I never have more than about 5000 downloaded
headers, of which maybe 500 have been read. The rest I bypass by choice.

--


Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)

Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
 
Tom will using (from the main Win Mail toolbar) Message>Watch
Conversation>(and you can choose the colors of the threads you mark at
Tools>Options>Read Tab>Highlight Marked Messages) help you?

I use this to mark the threads I want to follow, and it's not hard to
remember if you've read message on a thread that interests you.

Also I wonder if this will help you? Unless you're experiencing performance
problems across the board, or the point Richard Urban mentioned would come
into play on a long thread, I wouldn't think that your Win Mail is
performing unusually slow.

Try using this:

From the main toolbar of Win Mail Tools>Options>Read Tab> Checkmark in Box
"Mark all messages as read" when exiting a newsgroup."

CH
 
Tom Lake said:
Is it just my system or does using Mark All as Read take an
awfully long time in Windows Mail? In XP, Outlook Express marks
all messages as read almost instantaneously. Windows Mail takes
twenty to thirty seconds to mark just two or three messages!
Click to expand...


I have experienced this many times, it's not just you.


-Michael
 
Is it just my system or does using Mark All as Read take an
awfully long time in Windows Mail? In XP, Outlook Express marks
all messages as read almost instantaneously. Windows Mail takes
twenty to thirty seconds to mark just two or three messages!
Click to expand...

Not just you, I'm only following 2 newsgroups and unless I purge the
messages daily, the time to mark all as read goes up day by day. RC2 was
horrendously slow at doing this, it's better in Beta 2 but still wonder why
it takes so damn long on a pretty powerful machine...
 
Well, I was having same issue until I've upgraded from WEI 1.x to 5.5+
(including RAID0 system volume using SATA2 8MB cache NCQ disks). The problem
(?) seems to be related to new storage scheme (one file per message instead
of single database file per "folder" in OE) so probably you can expect
delays with high number of messages stored on mediocre/slow HDDs. I was
reading somewhere that MS was based it's hw reqs planning for Vista on
rather optimistic predictions so there you go... Chasing Moore's Law, eh?..
:-)
 
I would strongly disagree. The messages are stored as individual files, but
that should have no bearing on whether they are marked as read or not.
First of all, if you just download the NG headers, you still have slow
performance even if the messages are not downloaded. Second, the marked
read bit is in the database and not the message files, so that again should
not involved any access of those files.

This feature was always slow in OE with large numbers of messages in a NG.
The performance decreases one is experiencing in WinMail are no doubt
related to the database and its design and the inherent difficulties with
keeping a large number of entries in a database.

steve
 
Try CTRL-A followed by CTRL-Q. That has usually been faster in OE, but
performance of such features in WinMail is somewhat problematic with large
numbers of messages.

Also, there is a newsgroup for Windows Mail issues.

steve
 
Thanks for explaining. What I said about performance issues corellation with
storage scheme was just guessing.
 
I just wanted to clarify, as others are slamming the new message store
format and blaming everything on it, and it is not the problem in this
circumstance.

cheers,

steve
 
Don't seem to have issues here, like it way better than outlook,
not takin a performance hit usin it at all
workin fine

Jeff
 
Back
Top