A
Anthony Heydon
I don't know whether I am coming or going, I have got
myself that I can't see the wood for the trees.
I have an existing database with data already entered. I
have been asked to refine the database so that we are able
to obtain more localised reports.
The database is used to hold details of Clinical Audits,
who, what, why etc AuditID is an autonumber and is the
primary key. We want to add a couple of extra fields
relating to the audits Standards and References. I can see
how these tables need a third table having the two fields
StandardID and ReferenceID as joined primary key but I am
getting no joy for results. Do I only need, say the
Standards table relating to the Audit table with say the
AuditID as a number field in the Standards table?
Should I emply the Audit table of data and start entering
from scratch so that the two new tables are being filled
from a fresh start.
I hope you can understand.
regards
Anthony Heydon
myself that I can't see the wood for the trees.
I have an existing database with data already entered. I
have been asked to refine the database so that we are able
to obtain more localised reports.
The database is used to hold details of Clinical Audits,
who, what, why etc AuditID is an autonumber and is the
primary key. We want to add a couple of extra fields
relating to the audits Standards and References. I can see
how these tables need a third table having the two fields
StandardID and ReferenceID as joined primary key but I am
getting no joy for results. Do I only need, say the
Standards table relating to the Audit table with say the
AuditID as a number field in the Standards table?
Should I emply the Audit table of data and start entering
from scratch so that the two new tables are being filled
from a fresh start.
I hope you can understand.
regards
Anthony Heydon