Many-2-many relationships: Can I be told ...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

....what I am missing?

If I have training courses and employees, I know that each employee attends
many training courses and each course is attended by many employees. That I
can understand.

If I set up a "1:n" relationship between "employee" and "course" I will know
by DEFAULT who attended what course. Since I am assuming that this is the
purpose of having a "1:n" relationship between "course" and "employee"
doesn't this make the 2nd relationship completely redundant?

I could be entirely wrong ... *sigh!*
 
The other important piece of the puzzle is that each course can be run
multiple times. Therefore employees enrol in an instance of a unit (e.g. the
2006 instance of "Basic Firefighting"), not just a unit

Therefore you need:
Unit table: one record for each subject that an employee can do:
UnitID primary key

Course table: One record for every time a Unit is offered
CourseID primary key
UnitID foreign key to Unit.UnitID
StartDate when this instance of this unit begins.

Enrol table: One record for every student in a course.
EnrolID Primary key
CourseID Which couse the person enrolled in. (Defines Unit too.)
EmployeeID Who enrolled in this course.
Outcome Whether the employee met all criteria

Employee table: One record for each person
EmployeeID primary key

The Enrol table above resolves the many-to-many relationship between Course
and Employee into a pair of one-to-many.
 
I realise each course can be run multiple times.

In my database, I have a "1:n" relationship between "employee" and "course".
I can select in the "course subform" all the training courses that each
individual employee does.

whats wrong with that?
 
If you have a one-to-many relation between employee and course, you have an
EmployeeID field in your Course table. Therefore one employee can do
multiple courses, but any course can have only one employee.
 
It isn't as though we have set annual time tables like a professional
training organisation would have. The training where I work is done on an
ad-hoc basis and whenever its required so I will include a date field to say
when the employee did that course.

I had a discussion with BruceM which turned rather heated but it was my
fault for not being clearer than I should have been.
 
Im being quite presumptious because the user won't get feedback from the
managers until next week! umm...
 
Any 1:M relationship can be written in plain English in two sentences, one
for each direction. Like this:

Each Employee can take One or More Courses
Each Course can be taken by One And Only One Employee

This is what a One-To-Many relationship means, so by definition, if you
create a 1:M relationship, only one employee can take any given course.

--
--Roger Carlson
MS Access MVP
Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com
Want answers to your Access questions in your Email?
Free subscription:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=ACCESS-L
 
yes, i followed that thread. the issue is not how clear your descriptions
are, hon. you seem to think that if you explain your entities enough,
someone will tell you that they are not a many-to-many relationship and you
don't need a junction table. but the fact is that employees and courses IS a
many-to-many relationship, and you DO need a third, junction table to model
that relationship.

hth
 
I know it is a many-to-many relationship. In principle I can see that a
junction box IS required. I'm not disagreeing with you but I still haven't
been given a convincing *practical* (and I emphasise the word "practical")
argument as to why it is required.

Asking the question differently, If I also create a 1:n relationship between
course and employee what practical advantage does that have for form design
and data entry?

If that question can be answered for me, I would be happy!
 
Not necessarily.

With just a 1:n relationship between employee and course not only can I
select multiple courses for one employee, I can also select the same course
for multiple employees.
 
But that doesn't mean to say I can't list all the employees who have taken a
specific course? If establishing a 1:n relationship between course and
employee means it could be quicker to enter information into a form, then
there is a trade off.
 
Clearly, I have no idea what you are talking about either.

If your tables have no foreign keys, you can do what you like.
 
Of course they have foreign keys!

I can list all the employees on a given course by using a query.
 
What foreign key do you have?

Does your Course table have an EmployeeID foreign key?
Or does your Employee table have a CourseID foreign key?
 
Simple example:

1:n relationship and create the following query.

Name Course

John A
John B
John C
Sarah A
Sarah C
Sarah D
Phil B
Phil C
Phil D

I now know that

Course A was attended by John and Sarah
Course B was attended by John and Phil
Course C was attended by John, Sarah and Phil
Course D was attended by Sarah and Phil

If there is anything wrong with this please let me know.
 
You could do it all in one table:

course, course date, course leader, employee name, employee number, employee
phone

You could extract all of the information that you require from that one
table.

There would be a tremendous amount of data duplication. That is why we have
relational databases. In such a relational database the course table has all
the informations about a course.
The employee has all of the information about the employee.
and the link table has all of the information about the relationship between
the employee and the course.
It might have contain date enlisted, the fee paid, the student grade for
that course.

three tables.
 
How??? The relationship you describe is:

tblEmployees:

EmployeeID (PK)
EmployeeName

tblCourses:

CourseID (PK)
CourseName
EmployeeID (FK)

Now tell me how many employees can be enrolled in the course with CourseID =
1? Where are you going to store all these extra EmployeeID's???

Dave
 
Now tell me how many employees can be enrolled in the course with CourseID =
1?

I can have as many employees as I like! Obviously it means duplication of
courses for each employee.

Where are you going to store all these extra EmployeeID's???

Each employee info is already stored in the main table.
 
Course table has an employeeID foreign key

Allen Browne said:
What foreign key do you have?

Does your Course table have an EmployeeID foreign key?
Or does your Employee table have a CourseID foreign key?
Click to expand...
 
Which is the foreign key of this table.

Do you really have a foreign key called "Name"?
What happens when you have 2 employee with the same name?
Do you also have fields in this table for the address of each person?
So if someone attends 2 courses, you have to enter their address in 2
records?
 
Back
Top