Making the Windows Search indexer more aggressive

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sean McLeod
  • Start date Start date
S

Sean McLeod

Hi

Is there any way to make the Windows Search indexer more aggressive? I've
looked at 'Indexing Options' but don't see any such option.

In Windows Desktop Search (WDS) for XP there were 2 specific options. 1 to
specify whether the indexer should kick in 'sooner' rather than waiting for
idle time to index changed or new files, and secondly you could manually via
the interface tell it to 'Index Now', i.e. index any outstanding files now
rather than waiting for idle time.

The indexer in Vista beta2 seems to be very 'polite', it's taking forever to
index my current email and files even though I'm not actively using the PC
all the time either.

Cheers
 
I see there is a registry value 'UseLowPriorityConfiguration' on the
registry key:

HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows Search

And it is currently set to 1.

It's really locked down permission wise, only TrustedInstaller and the
WSearch account have write permission to the key. Administrators and
LocalSystem only have read access. So I haven't been able to easily change
it to 0 to see what effect it would have.

It just currently appears to be acting on a very very very low priority,
it's taken 14hrs to only index 10,000 items and the machine hasn't even been
used that heavily during this time.

Is there no other admin tool to tune this with other than hacking the
registry?

Cheers
 
I changed that registry registry value and still no luck. The indexer is on
a go slow slow slow strike!

Don't see any obivous problems in the event log.

Any tips on resolving this?

Cheers
 
Nah - the Search in Vista Beta 2 is pretty crap to be honest. It'll be fixed
in later builds :o)

--
Zack Whittaker
» ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
» MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
» Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
that up!

--: Original message follows :--
 
Back
Top