M
Mart Rogers
We have a situation where we have decided (in an attempt to keep things
simple) to stick to local assemblies rather than global ones.
However we now have the following situation looming
AssyA depends on AssyB depends on AssyD version 1
AssyA depends on AssyC depends on AssyD version 2
Obviously we cannot copy both versions of AssyD to the AssyA's bin
directory. Is the only sensible way around this (rather than going the GAC
route) to name the Assemblies by version number (e.g. AssyD001 andAssyD002).
How much of a development pain is the GAC route - all that key generation
stuff seems overkill for our 'local' libraries.
Many Thanks.
simple) to stick to local assemblies rather than global ones.
However we now have the following situation looming
AssyA depends on AssyB depends on AssyD version 1
AssyA depends on AssyC depends on AssyD version 2
Obviously we cannot copy both versions of AssyD to the AssyA's bin
directory. Is the only sensible way around this (rather than going the GAC
route) to name the Assemblies by version number (e.g. AssyD001 andAssyD002).
How much of a development pain is the GAC route - all that key generation
stuff seems overkill for our 'local' libraries.
Many Thanks.