A
Absolutely
Several times I've noticed that machines will not always look to a secondary
DNS server when the primary goes down. Why is this?
DNS server when the primary goes down. Why is this?
Absolutely said:2 2000 Servers (SP4), one with AD, the other member. DC is primary
DNS and member is secondary. Member is also mail server (IMail) and
DHCP. Workstations are 2000 and XP.
At some point last week the primary stopped responding to DNS queries
(restarting the DNS service cured it), but even though the secondary
was running fine, nothing would look to it for answers.
Absolutely said:Also if attempting nslookup when the hanging on the primary occurs, I
get this from the workstations:
DNS request timed out.
timeout was 2 seconds.
*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.25.20: Timed out
*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.25.40: Server failed
*** Default servers are not available
Default Server: UnKnown
Absolutely said:Didn't try to query, but I don't believe either server would resolve
anything. The way I found out about this is that my mail server was
returning messages as undeliverable. When I looked further I found it
could not resolve the names of receiving mail servers.
Forwarders are set to my circuit provider's DNS servers on both the
primary and secondary. The only firewall is between the WAN and LAN. DNS
servers and mail server is on the LAN.
Absolutely said:Any thoughts?
Absolutely said:Ok, so how do I determine if the workstations are in fact using the
secondary? And, even if they are, what would be the issue?
All I know is that as far as I can tell I have everything configured
correctly and if the primary goes down, things stop working.
Make sure the DNS server is listening on the correct IP address, has a
good
gateway address in TCP/IP properties, and can contact the forwarder and
root
servers on port 53 UDP.
Post the ipconfig /all from the Alternate DNS server machine and a client.
Absolutely said:Disregard that second address. That was there temporarily while I was
playing with a new firewall. Issue existed prior to that being there.
Oh, and in answer to your question, no.