Yes I have. But it may have escaped your own attention that the beta for
Vista is now closed - so I can't volunteer for it. If I could I would sign
up
for it in a heart beat and it is likely that we wouldn't be having this
conversation.
So there is nothing wrong with my comprehension and your rudeness is both
unwarranted and uncalled for.
As it happens - having looked through the various beta programs, there is
nothing really there that interests me - except (unsurprisingly perhaps
since
it is the biggest news to come out of MS in several years) Vista itself.
I think it's a valid concern to raise that Beta testers should only be
rewarded if they make valid contributions - and whether or not you are a
techbeta member should be irrelevant in this, as clearly this may not
always
reflect the extent of a beta testers contribution.
It just seems to me that there is a good possibility that techbeta Vista
members can potentially pretty much get away with sitting around
scratching
their rears and still be richly rewarded for it, while others who make far
more significant contributions and who are not official techbeta members
are
likely to be charged $500 minimum for the merely for the privilege of
having
made their contribution, if that is they wish to continue using Vista
after
the beta and RC stages have been completed.
This is exactly what happened during the XP betas, where techbeta members
of
the program were handed final versions for free, regardless of whether
they
had made any real contribution or not. There was no discrimination over
who
had contributed what - and indeed I know of several individuals at that
time
who either contributed nothing, or at best very little - but were still
handed free copies of the final production code, purely on the basis that
they were techbeta members. It didn't seem to matter if they were good
testers or bad testers, they simply needed to have the good fortune to be
members of the official beta program.
Nor do I think it is wrong to raise this issue - as as I said this is
hardly
a community based type effort. Most people stand to gain something from
participation - not least of all Microsoft themselves. I'm all for share
and
share alike - and indeed am an active and frequent contributor to a number
of
OSS community based products (yes I know Microsoft doesn't like OSS
software
- but really they are two different worlds and I tend to regard them as
such). But I don't know about working my butt off for a private company,
expending a great deal of valuable effort and time and taking the process
of
beta testing seriously if that contribution is unlikely to ever be
recognized. Why should anyone under those circumstances feel motivated to
genuinely contribute? MS make billions, while I don't even get the chance
of
a single free licence, regardless of whether my contribution is considered
valuable or useful or not? (Given that of course my contribution may well
be
judged to not be valuable at all. I'm not for example, saying that
everyone
who makes a false or erronerous bug report should automatically be granted
a
free licence).
Anyway it is irrelevant as I don't seem to be making any headway and some
posters appear to feel increasingly inclined towards rudeness.
I do hope though that Microsoft themselves will be gracious enough to take
my concerns into consideration.
Best regards,
GJ