A
Alias said:
Mike said:Did you read through that? Did you notice phrases like 'nearly matches',
'harder to learn', 'not quite as slick', and 'requires some sleight of
hand'?
Probably not, eh..
Did you know that Open Office will not be free for much longer?
Probably not, eh..
Do you go into Mac forums and bludgeon the people there with info on
open source programs you don't or never have used?
Probably not, eh..
Bill said:
Enjoy.
Frank said:Alias, the known idiot moron lying linux troll wrote:
-------------------------------------------
Yeah...right...and we'll believe that line of crap just as soon as you
stop lying, trolling and start believing in God...LOL! Frank
Mike said:Did you read through that? Did you notice phrases like 'nearly matches',
'harder to learn', 'not quite as slick', and 'requires some sleight of
hand'?
Probably not, eh..
Did you know that Open Office will not be free for much longer?
Probably not, eh..
Well?
Do you go into Mac forums and bludgeon the people there with info on
open source programs you don't or never have used?
Probably not, eh..
Frank said:Alias, the known idiot moron lying linux troll wrote:
-------------------------------------------
Yeah...right...and we'll believe that line of crap just as soon as you
stop lying, trolling and start believing in God...LOL!
Frank
Mike said:Did you know that Open Office will not be free for much longer?
Probably not, eh..
Alias said:Frank the Wank checks in with his usual garbage.
Alias
Frank said:What's wrong sheep-fukker? Can't deal with the truth, huh?
Figures!
Frank
Stephan said:However Alias, the GLP and LGPL do not prevent someone for charging for a
product. Hence why the whole play on the word "free" is so confusing.
Something that's L/GPL licensed does not mean it doesn't cost money. It
only means that you get full access to the source code and then can do
with it whatever you like. It does not mean that you don't have to pay to
get to it. Also, nothing is preventing dual licensing on open office.
One prime example is cross platform library I use, Qt. It is probably
best known as the library used to develop KDE applications and is GPL
licensed. However, it is also released under a commercial license for
which I pay about 2,000 usd a year as that's the license I need to use it
for any commercial non-open source development with it. Also contains a
few additional features not present in the open source version.
However, unless I see an official statement about open office starting to
cost money from a reputable source I'm not going to believe it.
Sorry, you don't know what I look like. I don't hang around Sheep!Alias said:You made a You Tube video. Looks just like you, Bill.
Alias
Alias said:And then spews even more garbage. I guess I should call you Frank the
Wank Garbage Man.
Alias
Alias said:It says it's free and can be copied, shared, etc.
Alias
You hang around Frank. That makes you a world class buffoon like heSorry, you don't know what I look like. I don't hang around Sheep!
Bill said:Sorry, you don't know what I look like.
I don't hang around Sheep!
Bill said:Of course it's free. It isn't worth anything. Takes the user
experience back about 10 years. Who would want to pay for that?