- Joined
- Mar 5, 2002
- Messages
- 25,751
- Reaction score
- 1,210
[MUCKS RANT ON]
I am being driven blind by Linux Browser Fonts ... and I am sick to the teeth of everybody telling me I should use CTRL + ... are you frigging blind also? ... have you got your head so far up your, you know where, that you can't see your nose on your face. Has ANYBODY got an answer?
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/000773.html
Notice the date on that ... well I have aslo tried, in vain, to get some sore of readability and I aint getting nowhere.
I concur ... anyboy want to argue with me ... then post a sensible reply.
[/mucks rant off]
I am being driven blind by Linux Browser Fonts ... and I am sick to the teeth of everybody telling me I should use CTRL + ... are you frigging blind also? ... have you got your head so far up your, you know where, that you can't see your nose on your face. Has ANYBODY got an answer?
... and me.Have you ever noticed what a royal pain in the ass it is to get fonts working on Linux that do not look like complete crap? On Windows it's a non-issue. On Mac OS X it's all quite amazing out of the box. But for some reason, having the X Window System on your desktop means that fonts must suck.
Here's a great example--a web browser. I want web pages to look decent on my Linux box. It's not asking a lot, is it? They don't have to look exactly as the "designer" intended, just nice. I have all high-resolution LCD displays at home. I run relatively modern graphics cards (or chipsets in the case of the notebooks) and nearly the latest release of X. Yet it's still a complete mystery to me.
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/000773.html
Notice the date on that ... well I have aslo tried, in vain, to get some sore of readability and I aint getting nowhere.
Conclusion
Linux is not ready for the desktop.
Why not? Fonts, that's why.
I concur ... anyboy want to argue with me ... then post a sensible reply.
[/mucks rant off]