R
Rick Robinson
Thanks for any help you can provide. Here's what is happening:
I have a series of linked Excel 2002 spreadsheets that are updated by
users and emailed thru Outlook each month. The sheets are password
protected, keeping users from disturbing formulas and links. Data
entry areas are unprotected. Users are instructed not to open directly
from Outlook attachment, to first detach the file & then open using
Windows Explorer or Excel directly. They also do not change the
filename.
Each month, an average of 30-40% of the files return with broken
links. Many times the new link lists a "temp" directory. My thinking
is that when being opened from an attachment Outlook first saves to a
temp or other directory [on the users computer] and this procedure
then changes the links. When the message appears on file opening to
"Update Links?" they are instucted to answer "NO" and proceed to
update the file, save, and return via email.
Is there any way to stop this from happening? I'm in process of
creating the 2004 series, and if a programming or other solution can
be implemented it will save many hours each month.
Thanks for any insights...
Rick
(e-mail address removed)
I have a series of linked Excel 2002 spreadsheets that are updated by
users and emailed thru Outlook each month. The sheets are password
protected, keeping users from disturbing formulas and links. Data
entry areas are unprotected. Users are instructed not to open directly
from Outlook attachment, to first detach the file & then open using
Windows Explorer or Excel directly. They also do not change the
filename.
Each month, an average of 30-40% of the files return with broken
links. Many times the new link lists a "temp" directory. My thinking
is that when being opened from an attachment Outlook first saves to a
temp or other directory [on the users computer] and this procedure
then changes the links. When the message appears on file opening to
"Update Links?" they are instucted to answer "NO" and proceed to
update the file, save, and return via email.
Is there any way to stop this from happening? I'm in process of
creating the 2004 series, and if a programming or other solution can
be implemented it will save many hours each month.
Thanks for any insights...
Rick
(e-mail address removed)