Legality of Concurrent Remote Desktop Sessions in WindowsXP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vincent
  • Start date Start date
V

Vincent

I stumbled across a website (http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-
remote-desktop) regarding the ability to enable concurrent remote
desktop sessions in Windows XP SP2. Apparently, this functionality
was removed before the final build was released. Does reenabling this
functionality constitute a violation of the EULA? The author of the
post cited believes this may be the case. Any Microsoft employees
willing to comment on this issue? Thanks!

Vincent
 
If you need a Microsoft employee, you'll need to contact Microsoft. This is
a peer-to-peer newsgroup.

|I stumbled across a website (http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-
| remote-desktop) regarding the ability to enable concurrent remote
| desktop sessions in Windows XP SP2. Apparently, this functionality
| was removed before the final build was released. Does reenabling this
| functionality constitute a violation of the EULA? The author of the
| post cited believes this may be the case. Any Microsoft employees
| willing to comment on this issue? Thanks!
|
| Vincent
|
 
If you need a Microsoft employee, you'll need to contact Microsoft. This is
a peer-to-peer newsgroup.


|I stumbled across a website (http://sig9.com/articles/concurrent-
| remote-desktop) regarding the ability to enable concurrent remote
| desktop sessions in Windows XP SP2. Apparently, this functionality
| was removed before the final build was released. Does reenabling this
| functionality constitute a violation of the EULA? The author of the
| post cited believes this may be the case. Any Microsoft employees
| willing to comment on this issue? Thanks!
|
| Vincent
|
Click to expand...

Yes, I am certain no Microsoft employee would ever read this newsgroup.
 
Vincent said:
Yes, I am certain no Microsoft employee would ever read this newsgroup.
Click to expand...
Even if they. replied, such reply would not be binding on MS. If you need
an official
answer to this question, you should contact MS directly and not through an
internet newsgroup.
Jim
 
Back
Top