D
darkknight0072004
I run a network am am beginning to evaluate Windows Vista. I installed
a KMS server on a 2003 server (it won't run in a VM which is a huge
annoyance) and have it servicing activations. I also installed Vista
Enterprise on a machine and had it register with my now working KMS
server (with volume license key installed). As I continue to evaluate
Vista (I'm nowhere close to done and it isn't my top priority) my
client has locked me out (the count on my KMS server is now 1). When I
ask it to activate it throws an error saying it can't activate because
the total number on my KMS server is below 25 (well, no kidding). This
is annoying beyond belief. Not only do I have licenses and jumped
through Microsoft's KMS hoops to essentially make their job easier I
now get bitten and can't use a product I have licenses for because I
am not suicidal and don't want to convert a perfectly stable network
to it all at once and within 90 days. If that is the model it is
flawed and this certainly does not encourage me to roll it out.
How does microsoft expect you to evaluate this OS if you have to
convert all your machines at once? What do they expect me to do with
the brick which is now my first XP OS with my half tested apps
installed? This isn't very inspiring.
-M
a KMS server on a 2003 server (it won't run in a VM which is a huge
annoyance) and have it servicing activations. I also installed Vista
Enterprise on a machine and had it register with my now working KMS
server (with volume license key installed). As I continue to evaluate
Vista (I'm nowhere close to done and it isn't my top priority) my
client has locked me out (the count on my KMS server is now 1). When I
ask it to activate it throws an error saying it can't activate because
the total number on my KMS server is below 25 (well, no kidding). This
is annoying beyond belief. Not only do I have licenses and jumped
through Microsoft's KMS hoops to essentially make their job easier I
now get bitten and can't use a product I have licenses for because I
am not suicidal and don't want to convert a perfectly stable network
to it all at once and within 90 days. If that is the model it is
flawed and this certainly does not encourage me to roll it out.
How does microsoft expect you to evaluate this OS if you have to
convert all your machines at once? What do they expect me to do with
the brick which is now my first XP OS with my half tested apps
installed? This isn't very inspiring.
-M