In alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.abit, GlassVial ordered an army of hamsters
to type:
Hey Wes, do you have any websites with benchmarks of xp vs sempron
cpu's of the same "speed" ? Like an Athlon XP 2600 vs a Sempron 2600?
All I've seen is the Sempron vs Celeron info, and Sempron appears to
destroy the celery handily.
-GV
Stop pestering poor Wes.
Its easy to work out the performance of a cpu, forget the stupid names they
are given for a minute.
Lets take your two choices a 2600+ Sempron and AthlonXP (32 Socket A)
The faster the Bus speed the faster the performance and the faster the
total speed the faster the performance (total speed being multiplier
multiplied by the bus speed)
Sempron 2600+ has a bus speed of 166mhz, not 333mhz as a lot of people say.
there is a reason for the 333 but its irrelevent for the time being.
This Sempron speed is 1.83ghz, thats 1830mhz, 1830/166 = 11 which is the
multiplier but its not important, the other two figures are.
Athlon XP 2600+ (Barton) speed is 1.92GHz (1920mhz) but also runs at a bus
speed of 166. Because of the higher total speed of the Athlon it is a
faster cpu.
An Athlon XP 2600+ Throughbred is 2.07ghz but the smaller cache size
hinders performance.
It is also worth noting that Semprons have a debilitating 256k L2 cache
like the Throughbreds and the Bartons have 512k to play with.
If wanted a true 2ghz cpu then another choice is a 2400+ AthlonXP32 but,
its bus speed is 133mhz and because of this it wouldn't be as good
performer as a Sempron 2800+
the 2600+ Sempron however is meant to mean it has a similar performance to
a 2.6Ghz Celeron and a 2600+ AthlonXP is meant to have similer performance
to a 2.6Ghz Pentium4... in practice the performaces maybe different.
All you need is a little information to work out a cpu's performance....
not the stuff a pr department churns out.