J
John
Heres the stick I bought thats on sale at Circuit City :
Its going for $45 or so after a rebate.
http://www.circuitcity.com/rpsm/oid/108887/rpem/ccd/productDetailSpecification.do#tabs
Its slower CL 3 memory.
Tried everything - including changing the timing etc and it always
came up with errors though not always right away. Sometimes it would
take a while and other times it would come up right away.
I see in the reviews generally OK remarks from users though two recent
ones say they get errors in PC usage after installing and another says
they tested for errors and saw them and had to exchange the stick and
then received a good one. Im leaning towards thinking I got a bad
stick and the QC just isnt as good as it used to be. I bought lots of
2700/333 mem Kingston in the last few months and never had a problem .
I would test your sticks -- the wave of cheap 400/3200 stuff thats on
sale now at various places just to see if its really OK.
My KBYTE - which is also known as a cheapo brand I keep testing it
over and over due to paranoia after the Kingston problems and it keeps
coming up clean. But then thats one of sticks I bought last year. I
just looked at my RMA replacement stick thats being sent by Kingston
for the old one that suddenly went bad and its CL 2.5 like the one I
sent them so Ill see how that tests.
Ive been reading some sites and I dont see any wave of posts talking
about horrible memory errors but there was a guy at one site who was
bashing Kingston which I thought was way off base (but who knows now)
and theres the two reviews at CCs site. Not sure if this means
Kingston is getter worse or if its just bad luck on my part.
Its going for $45 or so after a rebate.
http://www.circuitcity.com/rpsm/oid/108887/rpem/ccd/productDetailSpecification.do#tabs
Its slower CL 3 memory.
Tried everything - including changing the timing etc and it always
came up with errors though not always right away. Sometimes it would
take a while and other times it would come up right away.
I see in the reviews generally OK remarks from users though two recent
ones say they get errors in PC usage after installing and another says
they tested for errors and saw them and had to exchange the stick and
then received a good one. Im leaning towards thinking I got a bad
stick and the QC just isnt as good as it used to be. I bought lots of
2700/333 mem Kingston in the last few months and never had a problem .
I would test your sticks -- the wave of cheap 400/3200 stuff thats on
sale now at various places just to see if its really OK.
My KBYTE - which is also known as a cheapo brand I keep testing it
over and over due to paranoia after the Kingston problems and it keeps
coming up clean. But then thats one of sticks I bought last year. I
just looked at my RMA replacement stick thats being sent by Kingston
for the old one that suddenly went bad and its CL 2.5 like the one I
sent them so Ill see how that tests.
Ive been reading some sites and I dont see any wave of posts talking
about horrible memory errors but there was a guy at one site who was
bashing Kingston which I thought was way off base (but who knows now)
and theres the two reviews at CCs site. Not sure if this means
Kingston is getter worse or if its just bad luck on my part.