J
Joskin
Hello Gurus,
I think this is really simple, but I don't know where to start
I have a rain gauge in the garden & collect rainfall figures for the
Environment Agency. These figures are sent monthly on a pre-printed card -
I have no idea what they do with them !
But for personal & local interest, I have also kept these records on an
Excel spreadsheet since 1989, but I am now considering using a simple Access
2007 database instead, so that data queries/comparisons would be easier &
more versatile.
I need to record just one figure for each month of the year, eg 122.4mm in
March 2009; 145.3mm in April 2009 etc.
So, should my table have:
rows for the "Years" and columns for the "Months" or
rows for the "Months" and columns for the "Years" ?
The kind of output would be:
"Yearly totals from 1990 to 1999"
"November readings from 1995 to 2005"
"Wettest September, 2000 to 2009"
etc.
It would seem to come down to whether there should be many records (years)
of twelve fields (months), or whether it is better to have just 12 records
(months) of ever increasing fields (years).
Your advice please?
Thank you for reading,
Joskin
I think this is really simple, but I don't know where to start
I have a rain gauge in the garden & collect rainfall figures for the
Environment Agency. These figures are sent monthly on a pre-printed card -
I have no idea what they do with them !
But for personal & local interest, I have also kept these records on an
Excel spreadsheet since 1989, but I am now considering using a simple Access
2007 database instead, so that data queries/comparisons would be easier &
more versatile.
I need to record just one figure for each month of the year, eg 122.4mm in
March 2009; 145.3mm in April 2009 etc.
So, should my table have:
rows for the "Years" and columns for the "Months" or
rows for the "Months" and columns for the "Years" ?
The kind of output would be:
"Yearly totals from 1990 to 1999"
"November readings from 1995 to 2005"
"Wettest September, 2000 to 2009"
etc.
It would seem to come down to whether there should be many records (years)
of twelve fields (months), or whether it is better to have just 12 records
(months) of ever increasing fields (years).
Your advice please?
Thank you for reading,
Joskin