Kerio firewall Version 2.1.4

  • Thread starter Thread starter ms
  • Start date Start date
M

ms

Every link on Google for 2.1.4 actually downloads 2.1.5.

Anyone have a link to directly download version 2.1.4?

Mike Sa
 
ms said:
Every link on Google for 2.1.4 actually downloads 2.1.5.

Anyone have a link to directly download version 2.1.4?

Mike Sa
Click to expand...

I'm curious. Why do you want an old version of Kerio PF?

Rob
 
Especially when 2.1.5 was a version which fixed a security
vulnerability in 2.1.4, if I recall.
Click to expand...

It was a minor flaw that only affected network users, IIRC. Something about
remote administration. Other than that, 2.1.5 is identical to 2.1.4.
 
donut said:
It was a minor flaw that only affected network users, IIRC. Something about
remote administration. Other than that, 2.1.5 is identical to 2.1.4.
Click to expand...

I heard comments that 2.1.5 is buggy compared to 2.1.4, which I heard
worked well.

Mike Sa
 
ms said:
I heard comments that 2.1.5 is buggy compared to 2.1.4, which I heard
worked well.
Click to expand...

Then you need to check the validity and sources of such comments, as there
is absolutely NO difference, except that the minor problem with remote
administration was fixed.
 
ms said:
I heard comments that 2.1.5 is buggy compared to 2.1.4, which I heard
worked well.

Mike Sa
Click to expand...

Kerio 2.1.5 does not seem the least buggy for me. Works great,
imperceptible slow down, low memory footprint. easy to configure. After
the rash of recent worms, even though I am still on a dialup connection
(for only another week) I installed this firewall. I see about 1
penetration attempt a minute in the firewall log.
 
Kerio 2.1.5 does not seem the least buggy for me. Works great,
imperceptible slow down, low memory footprint. easy to configure. After
the rash of recent worms, even though I am still on a dialup connection
(for only another week) I installed this firewall. I see about 1
penetration attempt a minute in the firewall log.
Click to expand...
Especially when 2.1.5 was a version which fixed a security
vulnerability in 2.1.4, if I recall.
Click to expand...

It was a minor flaw that only affected network users, IIRC. Involved
remote administration. Other than that, 2.1.5 is identical to 2.1.4.
If you are not on a network you don't need to change from 2.1.4 to
2.1.5. I think it says this on the site.

BoB
 
BoB said:
It was a minor flaw that only affected network users, IIRC. Involved
remote administration. Other than that, 2.1.5 is identical to 2.1.4.
If you are not on a network you don't need to change from 2.1.4 to
2.1.5. I think it says this on the site.

BoB
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info, BoB.

Mike Sa
 
It was a minor flaw that only affected network users, IIRC. Involved
remote administration. Other than that, 2.1.5 is identical to 2.1.4.
If you are not on a network you don't need to change from 2.1.4 to
2.1.5. I think it says this on the site.
Click to expand...

if you are not on a network, why would you need a firewall?
or do you differ between internet and 'a network' ?
 
if you are not on a network, why would you need a firewall?
or do you differ between internet and 'a network' ?
Click to expand...

Yes, if you are not on a 'local network'. Only a few pros, who
do not share files, care to risk using the internet w/o a FW.

BoB
 
Might work better than more current version for someone i guess?
Click to expand...

It shouldn't work any differently than v2.1.4. V2.1.5 fixed a security
vulnerability in 2.1.4. It was a minor flaw that only affected network
users, IIRC. Involved remote administration. Other than that, 2.1.5 is
identical to 2.1.4. I am not on a network so have not updated.

BoB
 
Back
Top