I was just wondering. Have all the ISP's gone out of business now that
everyone either pays their phone company for DSL or their cable
company for a cable modem?
Depends on the area. Mine, a small outfit, offers 56K for $60-80 a
year, or broadband 125KB/s VOIP DSL at $22 monthly. Verizon is still
my POTS provider, and when I briefly switched to Verizon for the same
services, undercut to a $15 monthly on Verizon's first-year
introduction, it was a nightmare. Billing (combined telco/POTs) was
invariably a mutli-paged quagmire, (and a separate rant), and DSL
issues were referenced to hours of playing circle-jerk in Verizon's CS
support center, based out of Pakistan.
But, that's why the law frowns on monopolies. I switched back to the
small local provider and have largely resolved my own issues by buying
my own modems (rock-solid ActionTec units), instead of using plague-
infested second-hand Zooms and no-name equipment the independent ISP
(the small ISP rents internet time from Verizon) were sending me.
A DSL modem has to be physically located within certain a distance
limitations to the signal source, Verizon's, of course, and the law
says I can contract an outside DSL subscription through a different
ISP, while having Verizon turn off all its services. The term is
called a "Dry Socket" and and will freak-out Verizon. That's how I
phrased it when Verizon was unsuccessful at switching me over to their
$100 monthly FIFO packaged deal, which supposedly would correctly
address how disgusted I felt after dealing their POTs billing or
support for DSL. All after they got wind of my intents, miraculously
switching me out of the Pakistani connection, entirely to Americans,
who proceeded to cajole me into keeping POTs landline services for one
third the price they'd been charging me for decades -- $30 monthly.
That's $9 now for a landline. If you're urban, out in the boonies,
your options are of course going to be limited to what businesses are
capable of investing into data-provider infrastructures. I'm not.