G Guest Jan 6, 2006 #1 I struggle to publish with FP publisher command. Can I not simply carry on using WS FTP? Is it as good? Thanx. Lochi.
I struggle to publish with FP publisher command. Can I not simply carry on using WS FTP? Is it as good? Thanx. Lochi.
T Tom [Pepper] Willett Jan 6, 2006 #2 If you are publishing to a host that has the FP server extensions installed, you must use the http publish. If they don't have them installled, you can use WS FTP.
If you are publishing to a host that has the FP server extensions installed, you must use the http publish. If they don't have them installled, you can use WS FTP.
K Kevin Spencer Jan 6, 2006 #3 No. If your site uses FrontPage server extensions, you must publish using FrontPage. -- HTH, Kevin Spencer Microsoft MVP ..Net Developer You can lead a fish to a bicycle, but it takes a very long time, and the bicycle has to *want* to change.
No. If your site uses FrontPage server extensions, you must publish using FrontPage. -- HTH, Kevin Spencer Microsoft MVP ..Net Developer You can lead a fish to a bicycle, but it takes a very long time, and the bicycle has to *want* to change.
C Curt J Raddatz Jan 6, 2006 #4 Why use WS-FTP? Just publish to ftp://<ftp site> instead of http://<web site> and FrontPage will use FTP.
Why use WS-FTP? Just publish to ftp://<ftp site> instead of http://<web site> and FrontPage will use FTP.
