M
metremeter
Hi,
I've been testing a 600 DPI large-scale printer (HP 3000CP), but my
boss is disappointed with the quality of the printouts so far. They
remind me of my late-1990s Canon BJC printer (which was apparently 720
x 360 DPI, and from what I remember noticably coarser than the one I
replaced it with four or five years back).
The printer output is the image in the centre here:-
http://home.freeuk.com/misacham/temp/compare.jpg
Please ignore the softness of the image (it's a small pic that was
scaled up and set to 900 DPI). What I'm interested in is the
coarseness of the dots themselves- note particularly the light area of
the girl's hair where you can see individual dots.
For comparison, the picture on the left is scanned from a colour
newspaper picture, and the one on the right is from a DVD cover.
I appreciate that this printer is itself a few years old, and intended
for large scale work where such details might not be so important,
but... is this "600 DPI" quality?
- MM
I've been testing a 600 DPI large-scale printer (HP 3000CP), but my
boss is disappointed with the quality of the printouts so far. They
remind me of my late-1990s Canon BJC printer (which was apparently 720
x 360 DPI, and from what I remember noticably coarser than the one I
replaced it with four or five years back).
The printer output is the image in the centre here:-
http://home.freeuk.com/misacham/temp/compare.jpg
Please ignore the softness of the image (it's a small pic that was
scaled up and set to 900 DPI). What I'm interested in is the
coarseness of the dots themselves- note particularly the light area of
the girl's hair where you can see individual dots.
For comparison, the picture on the left is scanned from a colour
newspaper picture, and the one on the right is from a DVD cover.
I appreciate that this printer is itself a few years old, and intended
for large scale work where such details might not be so important,
but... is this "600 DPI" quality?
- MM