H
Hilary
I bought a desktop and a laptop late last year, both preinstalled with Vista
Home Premium. I'm stuck with a very slow dialup internet connection, for at
least another few months.
I'm migrating straight from an 8-year-old 98SE computer, and didn't notice
in the shop that neither computer has a phone line (RJ11) port or, therefore,
a dialup modem (I'd just taken them for granted, so didn't check!)
Delays followed; finding out that I needed a USB-to-RJ11 dialup modem, then
getting Vista to detect it (in the middle of yet another modem reinstall in
the desktop, I went off to do something else, during which it finally dawned
on Vista that there was something there). I immediately connected to the
internet successfully, visiting a website or two (briefly, because of
security apps not yet organised). I repeated the process with the laptop,
with equal success.
That was in June, and I haven't been able to connect either computer to the
internet since. The error messages with both more or less alternate between
'no dial tone' (when I can hear one) and 'remote computer not responding'
Vista can't find anything wrong with the internet connection.
My phone line is very poor quality. When the new computers connected ok, it
was at about 16kbps, and it's got worse. I've been watching it (with this
98SE computer I'm using for the internet), and haven't seen it at 16kbps
since. It's 12kbps on a good day, and varies down to 4.6kb.
I've been looking at the modem logs, printing out selections from them (and
deleting the rest between internet sessions to keep the reading manageable!).
The old computer's log, on the bad days when connecting takes several
attempts, tells a similar story to the Vista machines' logs of unsuccessful
connection attempts. I haven't yet studied the info I've gathered on
understanding modem logs, but they're all liberally sprinkled with 'no
carrier', which seems self-evident enough!
Remembering Vista's modem detection glitch, I've been wondering if Vista
needs longer times to respond to data from the remote computer than 98SE
does, and somehow misses the windows of opportunity to connect through a poor
phone line? Vista's drop-down port speed selector goes down to 12kbps (if I
remember correctly). I have no experience of XP (I could only recently
afford to replace the 98SE machine).
Does Vista need some minimum connection speed? I haven't been able to find
any reference to that.
Home Premium. I'm stuck with a very slow dialup internet connection, for at
least another few months.
I'm migrating straight from an 8-year-old 98SE computer, and didn't notice
in the shop that neither computer has a phone line (RJ11) port or, therefore,
a dialup modem (I'd just taken them for granted, so didn't check!)
Delays followed; finding out that I needed a USB-to-RJ11 dialup modem, then
getting Vista to detect it (in the middle of yet another modem reinstall in
the desktop, I went off to do something else, during which it finally dawned
on Vista that there was something there). I immediately connected to the
internet successfully, visiting a website or two (briefly, because of
security apps not yet organised). I repeated the process with the laptop,
with equal success.
That was in June, and I haven't been able to connect either computer to the
internet since. The error messages with both more or less alternate between
'no dial tone' (when I can hear one) and 'remote computer not responding'
Vista can't find anything wrong with the internet connection.
My phone line is very poor quality. When the new computers connected ok, it
was at about 16kbps, and it's got worse. I've been watching it (with this
98SE computer I'm using for the internet), and haven't seen it at 16kbps
since. It's 12kbps on a good day, and varies down to 4.6kb.
I've been looking at the modem logs, printing out selections from them (and
deleting the rest between internet sessions to keep the reading manageable!).
The old computer's log, on the bad days when connecting takes several
attempts, tells a similar story to the Vista machines' logs of unsuccessful
connection attempts. I haven't yet studied the info I've gathered on
understanding modem logs, but they're all liberally sprinkled with 'no
carrier', which seems self-evident enough!
Remembering Vista's modem detection glitch, I've been wondering if Vista
needs longer times to respond to data from the remote computer than 98SE
does, and somehow misses the windows of opportunity to connect through a poor
phone line? Vista's drop-down port speed selector goes down to 12kbps (if I
remember correctly). I have no experience of XP (I could only recently
afford to replace the 98SE machine).
Does Vista need some minimum connection speed? I haven't been able to find
any reference to that.