is it beneficial to place pictures in separate folders

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

My website, an animal rescue adoption site, has dozens of pictures in it. I
now have the pictures separated into 2 folders -- only because it's easier
for me to locate them that way. Each of the folders has about 100 pictures
in it. In the FrontPage manual, it mentioned something about the speed of
loading pages being increased if there were folders made that separated
bunches of files. Does anyone know if this makes a difference?
Thank you.
Pam
 
PJ said:
My website, an animal rescue adoption site, has dozens of pictures in
it. I now have the pictures separated into 2 folders -- only because
it's easier for me to locate them that way. Each of the folders has
about 100 pictures in it. In the FrontPage manual, it mentioned
something about the speed of loading pages being increased if there
were folders made that separated bunches of files. Does anyone know
if this makes a difference?
Thank you.
Pam

I don't know about speed in loading, but just for convenience alone, its a
good idea

I use this structure
images
display
thumbnails

images contains my large pictures (about 200 pics)
images/thumbnails contains the thumbnails of the large pictures (ditto)
images/display contains gifs etc which are used to pretty up a page (about
100)

In the HTML I refer to them as
images/trevor.jpg
images/thumbnails/trevor.jpg
images/display/info.gif
etc.
 
Thank you, that is helpful.

Trevor L. said:
I don't know about speed in loading, but just for convenience alone, its a
good idea

I use this structure
images
display
thumbnails

images contains my large pictures (about 200 pics)
images/thumbnails contains the thumbnails of the large pictures (ditto)
images/display contains gifs etc which are used to pretty up a page (about
100)

In the HTML I refer to them as
images/trevor.jpg
images/thumbnails/trevor.jpg
images/display/info.gif
etc.
 
Back
Top